Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Armstrong Jake's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Armstrong Jake's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Armstrong Jake's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Armstrong Jake's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 05:34 to 04:01 | 41.3% |
| Run Total | 01:09 | 38:25 to 37:16 | 30.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:30 | 02:45 to 02:15 | 13.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 04:22 to 03:54 | 12.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:49 to 01:45 | 1.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 05:01 to 05:00 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Armstrong Jake | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 04:59 | 04:18 -00:16 | 04:14 +00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 09:01 | 04:33 -00:06 | 08:32 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 13:28 | 02:37 +00:08 | 13:05 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 16:13 | 04:53 -00:07 | 15:42 +00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 04:22 | 20:59 | 04:21 +00:01 | 20:35 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 25:21 | 04:52 -00:07 | 24:56 +00:25 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:34 | 30:06 | 04:31 +01:03 | 29:48 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 35:40 | 04:59 +00:00 | 34:19 +01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 40:39 | 04:36 -00:10 | 39:18 +01:21 |
| Running 6 | 04:43 | 45:05 | 04:53 -00:10 | 43:54 +01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 49:48 | 01:57 -00:08 | 48:47 +01:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:42 | 51:37 | 04:52 -00:10 | 50:44 +00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:37 | 56:19 | 04:26 -00:49 | 55:36 +00:43 |
| Running 8 | 05:07 | 59:56 | 05:15 -00:08 | 01:00:02 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:01 | 01:05:03 | 05:37 -00:36 | 01:05:17 -00:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:36 | 01:16:33 | 05:39 +00:57 | 01:16:33 |
Jake Armstrong showed a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, ranking in the top 15% overall and top 17% in his age group. He demonstrated a strong running profile, with a total running time that was 21 seconds faster than average. However, he seemed to start a bit slower than average in the initial running segments but improved as the race progressed. His excellent performance in strength-based exercises like the Ski Erg, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls contributed to his overall competitive time. Despite this, there are a few areas where Jake can focus on to further improve his performance.
For better performance in future races, Jake should consider implementing the following strategies:
With these targeted improvements and race strategies, Jake Armstrong has the potential to significantly improve his performance in future HYROX events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Jonathan | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:16:49 | |
| Holdensgaard Anders | 2024 Hamburg | 01:17:02 | |
| Nuñez Ivan | 2024 Madrid | 01:16:06 | |
| Cassoni Leigh | 2024 Milan | 01:16:09 | |
| Marcelissen Rob | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:16:52 | |
| Goldsmith Brian | 2021 Dallas | 01:16:21 | |
| Flynn Tim | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:16:42 | |
| Schneider Marc | 2024 Köln | 01:16:27 | |
| Walsh Joseph | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:34 | |
| Simon Quentin | 2024 Milan | 01:17:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
