Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Werkman Arwin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Werkman Arwin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Werkman Arwin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Werkman Arwin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:19 | 41:01 to 37:42 | 61.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 05:58 to 05:06 | 16.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:43 | 04:51 to 04:08 | 13.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:32 | 04:39 to 04:07 | 9.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Werkman Arwin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:28 | 00:00 | 04:17 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:28 | 04:19 -00:12 | 04:17 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 07:35 | 04:34 +00:13 | 08:36 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 12:22 | 02:37 -00:33 | 13:10 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 14:26 | 04:56 +00:09 | 15:47 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 03:29 | 19:31 | 04:22 -00:53 | 20:43 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:16 | 23:00 | 04:54 +00:22 | 25:05 -02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:39 | 28:16 | 04:34 +00:05 | 29:59 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:27 | 32:55 | 05:02 +00:25 | 34:33 -01:38 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 38:22 | 04:37 -00:12 | 39:35 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 42:47 | 04:56 +00:31 | 44:12 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 48:14 | 01:59 -00:17 | 49:08 -00:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 49:56 | 04:54 +00:30 | 51:07 -01:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:51 | 55:20 | 04:29 +00:22 | 56:01 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:00:11 | 05:21 +00:49 | 01:00:30 -00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 05:58 | 01:06:21 | 05:41 +00:17 | 01:05:51 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:10 | 01:17:23 | 05:51 -00:41 | 01:17:23 |
Arwin Werkman delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox, finishing in the top 17% overall and the top 14% in his age group. Despite a strong start in the running segments, where he initially outpaced the average, his performance tapered off as the race progressed. This suggests a tendency to start too fast, leading to fatigue in later stages. His total running time was 1:41 slower than average, indicating an area for improvement. Arwin exhibits a hybrid profile with a balance between running and strength disciplines. He performed exceptionally well in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Sled Pull, showcasing his strength capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noordegraaf Marcel | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:17:37 | |
| Lerner Martin | 2024 Malaga | 01:17:03 | |
| Pantani Luca | 2024 Madrid | 01:16:53 | |
| Zimmerman Andrew | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:17:13 | |
| Barry Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:44 | |
| Caves Andrew | 2023 London | 01:17:09 | |
| Petry Thilo | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:17:27 | |
| Cassidy Niall | 2024 Berlin | 01:17:42 | |
| Farhat Morgan | 2024 Marseille | 01:17:27 | |
| Gummersbach Sascha | 2024 Hamburg | 01:17:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:15:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
