Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Houts Kees's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Houts Kees's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Houts Kees's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Houts Kees's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:46 | 45:47 to 43:01 | 70.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:41 | 05:46 to 05:05 | 17.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:22 | 05:41 to 05:19 | 9.3% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:54 to 04:49 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:53 to 02:51 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:10 to 06:10 | 0.0% |
| Van Houts Kees | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:43 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:00 | 04:29 -00:07 | 04:43 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:29 | 08:22 | 05:06 +00:23 | 09:12 -00:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:53 | 13:51 | 03:00 -00:07 | 14:18 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 16:44 | 05:33 -00:02 | 17:18 -00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:27 | 22:15 | 05:06 -00:39 | 22:51 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 26:42 | 05:32 +00:04 | 27:57 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 32:18 | 05:37 +00:04 | 33:29 -01:11 |
| Running 5 | 06:03 | 37:59 | 05:43 +00:20 | 39:06 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 44:02 | 04:52 +00:02 | 44:49 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 48:56 | 05:34 +00:03 | 49:41 -00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 54:33 | 02:15 -00:09 | 55:15 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 56:39 | 05:33 +00:22 | 57:30 -00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 01:02:34 | 05:21 +00:25 | 01:03:03 -00:29 |
| Running 8 | 07:39 | 01:08:20 | 06:14 +01:25 | 01:08:24 -00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:10 | 01:15:59 | 06:48 -00:38 | 01:14:38 +01:21 |
| Roxzone | 06:35 | 01:28:37 | 07:11 -00:36 | 01:28:37 |
Kees Van Houts delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, placing in the top 39% overall and the top 45% in his age group. His overall time of 01:28:37 demonstrates a balanced skill set, though there are clear areas where he excels and others where he can improve. Notably, Kees has a slightly slower total running time compared to the average, which indicates he has a stronger profile in strength-based exercises. His pacing reveals that he started the race strongly, evidenced by his faster-than-average time in Running 1, but gradually slowed over the subsequent running segments. This suggests an opportunity to improve endurance and maintain a consistent pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rabis Antoine | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:28:38 | |
| Paye Steve | 2023 Chicago | 01:28:12 | |
| Young Iain | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:07 | |
| Van Den Tol Tjim | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:20 | |
| Ward Daniel | 2024 London | 01:29:05 | |
| Wolf Josh | 2023 Chicago | 01:28:38 | |
| Ricardez Flota José Roberto | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:28:21 | |
| Anderson Dan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:28:32 | |
| Pahr Marc | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:27 | |
| Shutlar Tom | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:37:21 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:32:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
