Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore National Stadium using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 493 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tan Kelvin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tan Kelvin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tan Kelvin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tan Kelvin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:28 | 59:41 to 54:13 | 69.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:36 | 11:16 to 09:40 | 20.4% |
| Rowing | 00:47 | 06:14 to 05:27 | 10.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:14 to 03:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:17 to 06:17 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:29 to 07:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:37 to 02:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:08 to 07:08 | 0.0% |
| Tan Kelvin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 05:33 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 05:37 | 04:54 -00:13 | 05:33 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 09:15 | 10:18 | 06:19 +02:56 | 10:27 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 03:14 | 19:33 | 03:54 -00:40 | 16:46 +02:47 |
| Running 3 | 06:43 | 22:47 | 07:06 -00:23 | 20:40 +02:07 |
| Sled Pull | 06:17 | 29:30 | 06:58 -00:41 | 27:46 +01:44 |
| Running 4 | 06:52 | 35:47 | 07:06 -00:14 | 34:44 +01:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:29 | 42:39 | 08:15 -00:46 | 41:50 +00:49 |
| Running 5 | 07:04 | 50:08 | 07:26 -00:22 | 50:05 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 06:14 | 57:12 | 05:32 +00:42 | 57:31 -00:19 |
| Running 6 | 06:39 | 01:03:26 | 07:09 -00:30 | 01:03:03 +00:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 01:10:05 | 02:54 -00:17 | 01:10:12 -00:07 |
| Running 7 | 07:27 | 01:12:42 | 07:16 +00:11 | 01:13:06 -00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:08 | 01:20:09 | 07:41 -00:33 | 01:20:22 -00:13 |
| Running 8 | 10:07 | 01:27:17 | 09:00 +01:07 | 01:28:03 -00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 11:16 | 01:37:24 | 09:54 +01:22 | 01:37:03 +00:21 |
| Roxzone | 09:08 | 01:57:40 | 10:43 -01:35 | 01:57:40 |
Kelvin Tan demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Singapore National Stadium Hyrox race, finishing within the top 55% of all competitors. His overall time was 01:57:40, placing him in the top 59% within his age group (40-44). A significant observation is that Kelvin's total running time was 00:59:41, which was 02:17 slower than the average, suggesting that his running performance could be improved. However, Kelvin excelled in strength-based exercises such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull, which indicates a strong strength profile. His pacing strategy shows a mix of both strong and weaker segments, with a notably slower start in Running 2. This implies Kelvin might have started a bit too fast, leading to an energy drop in subsequent running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Teague Mark | 2023 Dublin | 01:57:13 | |
| Go Warren | 2022 New York | 01:57:13 | |
| Lim Sean | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:57:40 | |
| Dinnegan James | 2024 Glasgow | 01:58:10 | |
| Villamizar Montes Dixon Alexander | 2024 Paris | 01:57:11 | |
| OShea Jonathan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:57:21 | |
| De Vera Estephen | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:57:28 | |
| Bottani Paolo | 2024 Milan | 01:57:50 | |
| Berenger Beau | 2024 Anaheim | 01:57:27 | |
| Teo Hong Kang | 2024 Singapore | 01:57:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Taipei | 01:50:39 | |
| 2024 Hong Kong | 02:01:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
