Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Richardson Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Richardson Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Richardson Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Richardson Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:07 | 44:26 to 41:19 | 73.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 05:35 to 04:55 | 15.6% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:54 to 04:43 | 4.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:45 to 04:35 | 3.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:54 to 04:46 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Richardson Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:24 | 04:25 -00:13 | 04:35 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 08:36 | 04:54 +00:12 | 09:00 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 13:42 | 02:52 -00:12 | 13:54 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:52 | 16:22 | 05:21 +00:31 | 16:46 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 22:14 | 04:51 -00:06 | 22:07 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 26:59 | 05:20 +00:17 | 26:58 +00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 32:36 | 05:14 +00:21 | 32:18 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 38:11 | 05:30 +00:18 | 37:32 +00:39 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 43:59 | 04:47 +00:07 | 43:02 +00:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 48:53 | 05:21 +00:23 | 47:49 +01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 54:37 | 02:09 -00:08 | 53:10 +01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 56:38 | 05:20 +00:13 | 55:19 +01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:02:11 | 05:01 -00:07 | 01:00:39 +01:32 |
| Running 8 | 06:25 | 01:07:05 | 05:55 +00:30 | 01:05:40 +01:25 |
| Wall Balls | 05:11 | 01:13:30 | 06:24 -01:13 | 01:11:35 +01:55 |
| Roxzone | 06:06 | 01:24:39 | 06:40 -00:34 | 01:24:39 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the analysis of his splits, Andrew's overall running time of 00:44:26 was 03:31 slower than the average. This suggests that he could benefit from improving his running performance. While his best running lap was faster than average, there is room for improvement in the other running segments. Additionally, Andrew's total running time indicates that he may have a stronger strength profile. Therefore, incorporating more running-focused training into his routine could help him become a more well-rounded athlete.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, Andrew Richardson can continue to excel in the Hyrox race and achieve even better results in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Angei Salvatore | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:38 | |
| Sykes Sam | 2024 Perth | 01:24:57 | |
| Tholberg Søren | 2024 Hamburg | 01:24:26 | |
| Scheit Marvin | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:24:49 | |
| Jørgensen Mads Pontoppidan Gundorph | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:24:21 | |
| Kuhnert Tim | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:24:44 | |
| Fitches Martin | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:11 | |
| Watts Trevor | 2024 New York | 01:24:21 | |
| Kuck Maximilian | 2023 Hannover | 01:24:37 | |
| Lim Kun Yi | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:24:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:24:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
