Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rees Huw's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rees Huw's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rees Huw's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rees Huw's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:11 | 43:51 to 42:40 | 38.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 06:02 to 05:14 | 26.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:34 | 06:53 to 06:19 | 18.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 05:17 to 05:01 | 8.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 05:03 to 04:49 | 7.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:08 to 02:07 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Rees Huw | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:16 | 00:00 | 04:42 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:16 | 04:29 -00:08 | 04:42 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 09:37 | 05:05 -00:15 | 09:11 +00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 14:27 | 02:59 -00:20 | 14:16 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 17:06 | 05:33 -00:03 | 17:15 -00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:03 | 22:36 | 05:05 -00:02 | 22:48 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 27:39 | 05:31 +00:06 | 27:53 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 33:16 | 05:34 +00:28 | 33:24 -00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 39:18 | 05:42 -00:14 | 38:58 +00:20 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 44:46 | 04:52 -00:08 | 44:40 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:24 | 49:30 | 05:33 -00:09 | 49:32 -00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 54:54 | 02:14 -00:06 | 55:05 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 57:02 | 05:32 -00:05 | 57:19 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 01:02:29 | 05:18 -00:01 | 01:02:51 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:07:46 | 06:11 +00:13 | 01:08:09 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:14:10 | 06:46 +00:07 | 01:14:20 -00:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:18 | 01:28:12 | 07:06 +00:12 | 01:28:12 |
Huw Rees demonstrated commendable performance in the 2024 Poznan race, placing within the top 65% of his age group, and within the top 60% of 774 athletes overall. Particularly noteworthy is his total running time of 00:43:51, which was 00:08 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile, with the potential for even further improvement. His pacing throughout the race, however, seems to have started slower than average, particularly in the first running segment, but he managed to regain speed in subsequent segments.
Moving forward, Huw should consider implementing the following strategies during his races for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zarfoss Benjamin | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:07 | |
| Camp Hardin | 2021 Austin | 01:27:43 | |
| Meinke Matthias | 2019 Hamburg | 01:28:39 | |
| Partyka Scott | 2023 Glasgow | 01:28:27 | |
| Ives Chris | 2023 London | 01:28:17 | |
| Stevenson Dwayne | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:16 | |
| Dangelo Charles | 2023 Chicago | 01:28:30 | |
| Hoek Dirk | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:47 | |
| Weir Rhys | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:28 | |
| Bynum Tyler | 2024 Dallas | 01:28:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
