Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quinn Lee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quinn Lee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quinn Lee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quinn Lee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 05:08 to 04:29 | 29.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 05:10 to 04:40 | 22.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 02:59 to 02:37 | 16.8% |
| Run Total | 00:20 | 41:09 to 40:49 | 15.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:16 | 06:06 to 05:50 | 12.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:02 to 01:59 | 2.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:01 | 04:49 to 04:48 | 0.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Quinn Lee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 05:24 | 04:24 -00:16 | 04:33 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 09:32 | 04:52 -00:12 | 08:57 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 14:12 | 02:52 +00:07 | 13:49 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 17:11 | 05:18 -00:32 | 16:41 +00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 21:57 | 04:49 +00:19 | 21:59 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 27:05 | 05:16 -00:20 | 26:48 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 32:01 | 05:07 -00:18 | 32:04 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 36:50 | 05:26 +00:19 | 37:11 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 42:35 | 04:46 -00:06 | 42:37 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 47:15 | 05:18 -00:11 | 47:23 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 52:22 | 02:08 -00:06 | 52:41 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 54:24 | 05:17 -00:19 | 54:49 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:10 | 59:22 | 04:57 +00:13 | 01:00:06 -00:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:04:32 | 05:51 -00:15 | 01:05:03 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:10:08 | 06:16 -00:10 | 01:10:54 -00:46 |
| Roxzone | 07:41 | 01:23:47 | 06:37 +01:04 | 01:23:47 |
Lee Quinn delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, placing in the top 30% of all athletes and top 35% within his age group. His overall running time was faster than the average, suggesting a strong runner profile. However, his Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating potential areas for improvement in overall fitness and transition times. A detailed examination of his split times indicates that Lee started the race slower than average, but picked up speed as the race progressed. This may indicate a pacing strategy or a need to work on starting speed.
To further improve his race performance, Lee might consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson Anthony | 2024 London | 01:24:13 | |
| Steventon John | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:24:05 | |
| Draščić Ulli | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:41 | |
| Welsch Fabian | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:23:31 | |
| Koopman Casper | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:23:44 | |
| Bouffort Kevin | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:18 | |
| Lawson Michael | 2024 New York | 01:23:22 | |
| Hart Mike | 2023 London | 01:23:54 | |
| Clancy Jason | 2022 London | 01:23:26 | |
| Hernqndez Moises | 2023 Madrid | 01:23:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:23:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
