Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire phelan shane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights phelan shane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the phelan shane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve phelan shane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:54 | 08:06 to 05:12 | 58.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:33 | 02:21 to 01:48 | 11.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:24 | 04:26 to 04:02 | 8.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 02:41 to 02:20 | 7.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 04:33 to 04:12 | 7.0% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:42 to 04:32 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:21 to 04:13 | 2.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:20 to 04:12 | 2.7% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:54 to 36:54 | 0.0% |
| phelan shane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:58 | 00:00 | 04:18 -01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 02:58 | 04:20 +00:01 | 04:18 -01:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 07:19 | 04:37 -00:24 | 08:38 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 11:32 | 02:40 +00:01 | 13:15 -01:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 14:13 | 05:00 +00:22 | 15:55 -01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 19:35 | 04:26 +00:00 | 20:55 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 24:01 | 04:59 -00:07 | 25:21 -01:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 28:53 | 04:37 -00:04 | 30:20 -01:27 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 33:26 | 05:07 -00:08 | 34:57 -01:31 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 38:25 | 04:38 +00:04 | 40:04 -01:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:05 | 43:07 | 05:01 +00:04 | 44:42 -01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 48:12 | 02:00 +00:21 | 49:43 -01:31 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 50:33 | 05:00 -00:19 | 51:43 -01:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:20 | 55:14 | 04:33 -00:13 | 56:43 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 04:46 | 59:34 | 05:26 -00:40 | 01:01:16 -01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 08:06 | 01:04:20 | 05:44 +02:22 | 01:06:42 -02:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:03 | 01:18:22 | 05:56 +00:07 | 01:18:22 |
Shane Phelan showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier HYROX race. His overall rank of 193 puts him in the top 13% of all athletes, and his age group rank of 54 places him in the top 17%. Shane's total running time of 36:54 was significantly faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile. He started the race strong, with his time on Running 1 being 01:17 faster than average. His performance remained consistent throughout most of the running segments, except for Running 3 where he lagged by 00:20. His overall pacing appears well-balanced, indicating a good understanding of race strategy. However, there are some areas where Shane could improve to further enhance his performance.
To improve his overall performance, Shane could consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lantinga Erik | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:39 | |
| Rubio Govantes Daniel | 2023 Malaga | 01:18:33 | |
| Rößeler Marc Andre | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:18:34 | |
| Gillespie Josh | 2023 London | 01:18:09 | |
| Dolan Micheal | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:40 | |
| Thewes Robin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:19 | |
| Cleary Jagan | 2020 Chicago | 01:18:24 | |
| Sironi Jesse | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:17:56 | |
| Smidt Jeroen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:17:53 | |
| Kyne Gareth | 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:27:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
