Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 811 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peterson Mike's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peterson Mike's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peterson Mike's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peterson Mike's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:57 | 55:08 to 51:11 | 41.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:35 | 10:17 to 06:42 | 38.0% |
| Sled Push | 01:32 | 05:17 to 03:45 | 16.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 05:10 to 04:49 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:18 to 05:17 | 0.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Peterson Mike | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:40 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:10 | 05:40 | 04:47 +00:23 | 05:18 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 03:56 | 10:50 | 05:59 -02:03 | 10:05 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 05:17 | 14:46 | 03:43 +01:34 | 16:04 -01:18 |
| Running 3 | 04:07 | 20:03 | 06:36 -02:29 | 19:47 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 05:57 | 24:10 | 06:32 -00:35 | 26:23 -02:13 |
| Running 4 | 04:10 | 30:07 | 06:35 -02:25 | 32:55 -02:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:37 | 34:17 | 07:23 -02:46 | 39:30 -05:13 |
| Running 5 | 04:09 | 38:54 | 06:54 -02:45 | 46:53 -07:59 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 43:03 | 05:19 -00:01 | 53:47 -10:44 |
| Running 6 | 03:59 | 48:21 | 06:39 -02:40 | 59:06 -10:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 52:20 | 02:41 -00:11 | 01:05:45 -13:25 |
| Running 7 | 04:08 | 54:50 | 06:40 -02:32 | 01:08:26 -13:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:17 | 58:58 | 06:55 +03:22 | 01:15:06 -16:08 |
| Running 8 | 04:01 | 01:09:15 | 08:08 -04:07 | 01:22:01 -12:46 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:13:16 | 08:52 -02:41 | 01:30:09 -16:53 |
| Roxzone | 29:35 | 01:48:54 | 09:53 +19:42 | 01:48:54 |
Mike's best running lap was 00:24:56, indicating his potential as a runner. However, there were certain areas where he lost time compared to the average, such as the Roxzone (resting/transition time), running 1, and ski erg.
In conclusion, Mike Peterson had a solid performance in the 2021 Chicago Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on reducing his Roxzone time, improving his running speed in segments such as running 1 and ski erg, and incorporating specific training strategies tailored to his running profile. By implementing these recommendations and strategies, Mike can continue to enhance his performance and achieve his goals in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hojnacki Carl | 2024 Dallas | 01:49:02 | |
| Jansen Jonar | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:48:58 | |
| Hürten Felix | 2024 Madrid | 01:48:34 | |
| Yazici Tolga | 2023 Hamburg | 01:48:39 | |
| Acosta Joe | 2023 Anaheim | 01:48:52 | |
| Fernandes Jérôme | 2024 Marseille | 01:49:18 | |
| Jeffrey Paul | 2024 Madrid | 01:49:16 | |
| Mifsud Munro Ranier | 2024 Köln | 01:48:34 | |
| Böhm Christian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:48:24 | |
| Hoffmann Denis | 2022 Leipzig | 01:49:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
