Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Peterson Joshua's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Peterson Joshua's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Peterson Joshua's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Peterson Joshua's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:24 | 06:54 to 04:30 | 54.5% |
| Run Total | 01:23 | 40:49 to 39:26 | 31.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 | 05:52 to 05:30 | 8.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:41 to 04:26 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Peterson Joshua | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:43 | 04:21 -00:19 | 04:22 -00:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 07:45 | 04:44 +00:16 | 08:43 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 12:45 | 02:44 -00:33 | 13:27 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 14:56 | 05:07 -00:01 | 16:11 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 03:17 | 20:02 | 04:34 -01:17 | 21:18 -01:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 23:19 | 05:06 +00:11 | 25:52 -02:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 28:36 | 04:55 +01:59 | 30:58 -02:22 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 35:30 | 05:15 +00:11 | 35:53 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 40:56 | 04:41 -00:10 | 41:08 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 45:27 | 05:08 +00:11 | 45:49 -00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 50:46 | 02:04 -00:26 | 50:57 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 52:24 | 05:07 +00:20 | 53:01 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 57:51 | 04:45 -00:04 | 58:08 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:02:32 | 05:35 -00:01 | 01:02:53 -00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:08:06 | 05:58 -00:06 | 01:08:28 -00:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:48 | 01:20:37 | 06:11 +00:37 | 01:20:37 |
Joshua Peterson demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, finishing in the top 17% of all athletes and in the top 18% of his age group (35-39). His overall time for the race was 01:20:37. While his total running time was slightly slower than average by 12 seconds, he showed considerable strength in several segments of the race. A notable highlight is his performance in the Sled Pull segment, where he finished 1 minute and 16 seconds faster than the average, ranking him in the top 4 percentile. Joshua's pace in the first four running segments suggests that he started the race at a faster pace compared to the average, but gradually slowed down as the race progressed. This might indicate that Joshua has a stronger runner profile and could benefit from additional strength training.
Going forward, Joshua could consider implementing the following strategies during his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hartley David | 2022 London | 01:20:42 | |
| Brereton Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:50 | |
| Pownall Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:52 | |
| Mitchener Bruce | 2024 Anaheim | 01:20:07 | |
| Blair Nick | 2024 Katowice | 01:21:07 | |
| Hobley Marcus | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:19 | |
| Gofton Dean | 2024 Gdansk | 01:20:45 | |
| De Graaf Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:43 | |
| Bridge Dean | 2024 London | 01:20:59 | |
| Klossek Dennis | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
