Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 71 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oliver Aimee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oliver Aimee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oliver Aimee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oliver Aimee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:31 | 04:20 to 02:49 | 74.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 01:57 to 01:41 | 13.1% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:50 to 04:41 | 7.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 03:38 to 03:35 | 2.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 01:39 to 01:36 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 34:36 to 34:36 | 0.0% |
| Oliver Aimee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:56 | 00:00 | 03:53 -00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 02:56 | 04:34 -00:12 | 03:53 -00:57 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 07:18 | 04:08 +00:26 | 08:27 -01:09 |
| Sled Push | 01:57 | 11:52 | 02:05 -00:08 | 12:35 -00:43 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 13:49 | 04:18 +00:32 | 14:40 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 18:39 | 03:54 -00:17 | 18:58 -00:19 |
| Running 4 | 04:42 | 22:16 | 04:18 +00:24 | 22:52 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:38 | 26:58 | 03:38 +00:00 | 27:10 -00:12 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 30:36 | 04:23 +00:36 | 30:48 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 35:35 | 04:42 +00:08 | 35:11 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 04:41 | 40:25 | 04:20 +00:21 | 39:53 +00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:39 | 45:06 | 01:41 -00:02 | 44:13 +00:53 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 46:45 | 04:19 +00:22 | 45:54 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:02 | 51:26 | 03:10 -00:08 | 50:13 +01:13 |
| Running 8 | 03:16 | 54:28 | 04:30 -01:14 | 53:23 +01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 04:20 | 57:44 | 03:14 +01:06 | 57:53 -00:09 |
| Roxzone | 03:30 | 01:05:24 | 04:17 -00:47 | 01:05:24 |
Aimee Oliver, showing an exceptional performance, ranked 4th overall and 1st in her age group. This ranking places her in the top 0% of athletes in both categories. Her overall time for the event was 01:05:24. The total running time was 00:34:36, which was slightly slower than the average by 24 seconds. Aimee's best running lap was completed in 00:03:16.
Aimee demonstrated a strong start in the initial segments, notably Running 1, where she finished 56 seconds faster than average. Her Roxzone, signifying rest and transition times, was faster than average by 40 seconds, indicating efficient transitions and a good level of fitness. However, her running pace decreased as the race progressed, with running segments 2 through 7 consistently slower than average.
In terms of her profile, Aimee shows a hybrid profile, being able to maintain a good balance between strength and running. However, there's still some room for improvement in both areas to enhance her overall performance and competitiveness.
For future races, Aimee could adopt the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Willnow Alina | 2022 Essen | 01:05:07 | |
| Lenz Elisabeth | 2023 München | 01:04:57 | |
| Piergianni Zara | 2023 Bilbao | 01:05:35 | |
| Weston Jennifer | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:05:54 | |
| Ozimek Ivy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:04:57 | |
| Delorme Mathilde | 2023 Valencia | 01:05:54 | |
| Bilbie Sam | 2023 London | 01:05:32 | |
| Hill Alexandra | 2024 London | 01:05:35 | |
| Burnett Charlotte | 2023 London | 01:04:56 | |
| Obank Anabel | 2022 London | 01:05:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:13:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
