Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 784 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of O Neill Orla's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where O Neill Orla hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare O Neill Orla’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O Neill Orla's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:13 | 09:26 to 07:13 | 47.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 06:32 to 05:29 | 22.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:41 | 06:30 to 05:49 | 14.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 06:53 to 06:27 | 9.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 03:18 to 03:03 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:40 to 05:38 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 49:39 to 49:39 | 0.0% |
| O Neill Orla | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 05:39 -01:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:14 | 03:49 | 05:20 -00:06 | 05:39 -01:50 |
| Running 2 | 06:24 | 09:03 | 06:06 +00:18 | 10:59 -01:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:18 | 15:27 | 03:06 +00:12 | 17:05 -01:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:55 | 18:45 | 06:26 +00:29 | 20:11 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 06:53 | 25:40 | 06:36 +00:17 | 26:37 -00:57 |
| Running 4 | 07:06 | 32:33 | 06:28 +00:38 | 33:13 -00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:26 | 39:39 | 07:25 +02:01 | 39:41 -00:02 |
| Running 5 | 07:22 | 49:05 | 06:40 +00:42 | 47:06 +01:59 |
| Rowing | 05:40 | 56:27 | 05:39 +00:01 | 53:46 +02:41 |
| Running 6 | 06:43 | 01:02:07 | 06:31 +00:12 | 59:25 +02:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:08:50 | 02:29 -00:31 | 01:05:56 +02:54 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:10:48 | 06:31 -00:05 | 01:08:25 +02:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:17:14 | 05:37 +00:55 | 01:14:56 +02:18 |
| Running 8 | 04:57 | 01:23:46 | 07:11 -02:14 | 01:20:33 +03:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:30 | 01:28:43 | 06:01 +00:29 | 01:27:44 +00:59 |
| Roxzone | 07:04 | 01:42:07 | 08:22 -01:18 | 01:42:07 |
Orla O Neill demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox event, ranking in the top 23% of all athletes and the top 16% within her age group. With an overall time of 01:42:07, she showed a notable proficiency in her running segments, finishing with an overall running time of 00:49:39, which is 02:07 faster than the average.
Orla's performance indicates that she has a strong runner profile. Her fast start in the first running segment, where she was 01:43 faster than the average, shows good pacing. However, she tends to slow down in later running segments, suggesting that endurance might be an area of focus for training. Her Roxzone time was also faster than average, indicating efficient transition times and overall fitness levels.
While Orla showcased strength in her running segments and transitions, there are several areas in her performance that show potential for improvement:
Orla's race strategy should involve pacing herself better during the run segments, especially towards the middle and end of the race. While her running segments are strong overall, focusing on maintaining a steady pace throughout could conserve energy for strength-based tasks.
Strengthening her transition game could also shave off a few precious seconds from her overall time. This could involve practicing quick recoveries post strength segments to ensure her running speed doesn't drastically drop due to fatigue, and incorporating dynamic stretching and mobility drills to boost her recovery during these transitions.
Lastly, focusing her training more on the strength segments that showed potential for improvement can help balance her overall performance, making her a more well-rounded athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dörste Ulrike | 2023 Hamburg | 01:42:21 | |
| Mitchem Nadine | 2024 Marseille | 01:42:27 | |
| Smith Anne | 2024 Sydney | 01:42:18 | |
| Guenneugues Stéphanie | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:41:56 | |
| Gmeinder Annika | 2023 München | 01:41:42 | |
| Hensley Leah | 2020 Chicago | 01:41:53 | |
| Maxwell Jillian | 2023 Chicago | 01:42:15 | |
| Carden Angela | 2021 London | 01:42:09 | |
| Foo Shermaine | 2024 Dublin | 01:42:31 | |
| Alves Nélia | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:41:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
