Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Niemann Marc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Niemann Marc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Niemann Marc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Niemann Marc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:05 | 05:19 to 04:14 | 24.3% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 39:14 to 38:18 | 20.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 04:53 to 04:04 | 18.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:29 | 04:42 to 04:13 | 10.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:18 to 01:49 | 10.8% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 04:57 to 04:32 | 9.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:31 to 02:22 | 3.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 05:20 to 05:14 | 2.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:33 to 03:33 | 0.0% |
| Niemann Marc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:14 | 00:00 | 04:19 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:14 | 04:20 +00:22 | 04:19 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 07:56 | 04:38 +00:11 | 08:39 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 12:45 | 02:40 -00:09 | 13:17 -00:32 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 15:16 | 05:00 +00:04 | 15:57 -00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 20:20 | 04:27 +00:26 | 20:57 -00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 25:13 | 04:59 +00:01 | 25:24 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:33 | 30:13 | 04:39 -01:06 | 30:23 -00:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 33:46 | 05:08 -00:04 | 35:02 -01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 38:50 | 04:39 +00:18 | 40:10 -01:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:30 | 43:47 | 05:01 +00:29 | 44:49 -01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 49:17 | 02:01 +00:17 | 49:50 -00:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 51:35 | 05:00 +00:18 | 51:51 -00:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 56:53 | 04:35 +00:44 | 56:51 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:19 | 01:02:12 | 05:27 -00:08 | 01:01:26 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:07:31 | 05:46 -00:26 | 01:06:53 +00:38 |
| Roxzone | 05:53 | 01:18:35 | 05:56 -00:03 | 01:18:35 |
Marc Niemann's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race was commendable, placing him in the top 19% overall and top 21% within his age group. His total running time of 00:39:14 was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. Marc started the race aggressively, evident from his impressive Running 1 performance, but his pace waned slightly in later running segments. This suggests a need for better pacing to maintain speed throughout the race. While his running prowess is evident, the slower transitions in the roxzone suggest room for improvement in transition efficiency and overall fitness to reduce fatigue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Verschoor Sébastien | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:04 | |
| Perea Jorge | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:05 | |
| Rushforth Lee | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:56 | |
| Dalodier Charles | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:29 | |
| Starkl Simon | 2023 Wien | 01:18:09 | |
| Finn Dave | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:15 | |
| Hanson Dean | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:17 | |
| Yu Nicklaus | 2023 Singapore | 01:19:05 | |
| Rodger Ben | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:13 | |
| Brien Martin | 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Leipzig | 01:23:29 | |
| 2021 Stuttgart | 01:28:05 | |
| 2020 Hannover | 01:32:05 | |
| 2023 Hannover | 01:28:32 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:14:34 | |
| 2019 Hamburg | 01:40:01 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:19:15 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:26:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
