Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdonald Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdonald Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdonald Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdonald Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:37 | 06:30 to 05:53 | 43.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 05:17 to 04:42 | 40.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:48 to 04:42 | 7.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:25 to 04:21 | 4.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:40 to 02:38 | 2.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:02 to 02:00 | 2.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:35 to 40:35 | 0.0% |
| Mcdonald Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:38 | 00:00 | 04:33 +01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:38 | 04:25 +00:00 | 04:33 +01:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 10:03 | 04:53 -00:09 | 08:58 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 14:47 | 02:52 -00:12 | 13:51 +00:56 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 17:27 | 05:19 -00:31 | 16:43 +00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 04:06 | 22:15 | 04:50 -00:44 | 22:02 +00:13 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 26:21 | 05:17 -00:33 | 26:52 -00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:26 | 31:05 | 05:09 -00:43 | 32:09 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 35:31 | 05:26 -00:35 | 37:18 -01:47 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 40:22 | 04:46 +00:02 | 42:44 -02:22 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 45:10 | 05:18 -00:04 | 47:30 -02:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 50:24 | 02:09 -00:07 | 52:48 -02:24 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 52:26 | 05:17 -00:30 | 54:57 -02:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 57:13 | 04:58 +00:19 | 01:00:14 -03:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:02:30 | 05:52 +00:01 | 01:05:12 -02:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:30 | 01:08:23 | 06:17 +00:13 | 01:11:04 -02:41 |
| Roxzone | 09:14 | 01:23:59 | 06:38 +02:36 | 01:23:59 |
Andrew Mcdonald delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox event, placing in the top 31% overall and top 23% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than average, indicating a strong running profile. He started the race slightly slower but quickly gained momentum, with running segments 2 to 5 performed significantly faster than average. This suggests a well-paced race strategy, with room for improvement in the initial segment. Andrew demonstrates a hybrid athlete profile with a solid running foundation, yet there is room to enhance his strength performance, particularly in the sandbag lunges and wall balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gillespie Ross | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:05 | |
| Schillinger Silvio | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:54 | |
| Zandecki Artur | 2023 Warschau | 01:24:10 | |
| Ziegenthaler Uli | 2022 Leipzig | 01:23:39 | |
| Kolb Marius | 2023 München | 01:23:50 | |
| Furino Matthew | 2024 New York | 01:24:29 | |
| Murray Shane | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:44 | |
| Menku Zsolt | 2024 Beijing | 01:24:13 | |
| Staman Hugo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:39 | |
| Frias Gonzalez Francisco | 2024 Malaga | 01:23:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
