Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcconville Eamon's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcconville Eamon's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcconville Eamon's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcconville Eamon's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:01 | 44:50 to 40:49 | 77.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 03:08 to 02:37 | 10.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 06:08 to 05:50 | 5.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:10 to 01:59 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:51 to 04:41 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Mcconville Eamon | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:26 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:00 | 04:26 | 04:24 -00:24 | 04:33 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:26 | 04:53 -00:03 | 08:57 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 13:16 | 02:52 +00:16 | 13:50 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:24 | 05:18 +00:05 | 16:42 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:08 | 21:47 | 04:49 -00:41 | 22:00 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 25:55 | 05:16 +00:09 | 26:49 -00:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:10 | 31:20 | 05:07 -00:57 | 32:05 -00:45 |
| Running 5 | 05:39 | 35:30 | 05:26 +00:13 | 37:12 -01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 41:09 | 04:46 +00:05 | 42:38 -01:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 46:00 | 05:18 +00:28 | 47:24 -01:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 51:46 | 02:08 +00:02 | 52:42 -00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 53:56 | 05:17 +00:28 | 54:50 -00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 59:41 | 04:57 -00:43 | 01:00:07 -00:26 |
| Running 8 | 07:39 | 01:03:55 | 05:51 +01:48 | 01:05:04 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 06:08 | 01:11:34 | 06:16 -00:08 | 01:10:55 +00:39 |
| Roxzone | 06:13 | 01:23:48 | 06:37 -00:24 | 01:23:48 |
Eamon's overall time of 01:23:48 is respectable, but there are specific segments where he lost time compared to the average finisher. His total running time of 00:44:50 was 04:22 slower than the average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running performance. Additionally, his running splits in segments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were slightly slower than the average, suggesting room for improvement in his running endurance and speed.
Overall, with targeted training strategies and a focus on improving his running performance and transition times, Eamon Mcconville can continue to enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. By incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to his areas of improvement, he can work towards achieving better results and higher rankings in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chaplin Ross | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:28 | |
| Petit Antoine | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:23:23 | |
| Cooper Rob | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:23 | |
| Thompson Kristofer | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:23:30 | |
| Simons Bas | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:23:53 | |
| Ziegenthaler Uli | 2022 Leipzig | 01:23:39 | |
| Wawer Lennard | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:24:05 | |
| Karnacz Alex | 2024 London | 01:24:00 | |
| Favre Yann | 2023 München | 01:23:24 | |
| Sawyer Steve | 2023 London | 01:23:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:14:44 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:15:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
