Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
946 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 946 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 946 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Mc Kenna Eimear's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mc Kenna Eimear's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 946 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mc Kenna Eimear's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Women
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Kenna Eimear's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:28.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 946 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Women
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Firstly, it's important to acknowledge Eimear Mc Kenna's impressive results. She ranked in the top 3% of all athletes and the top 4% of her age group, showing a high level of fitness and competitive spirit. Her total running time was slower than average, suggesting that she may have a stronger profile in strength-based exercises. Eimear started the race fast, as indicated by the running 1 segment, which was 01:03 faster than average. However, her pace seemed to drop in the later running segments, suggesting that she may have started too fast and struggled to maintain her initial pace throughout the race.
Segments to Improve:
Run Total: Eimear's total running time was slower than average, indicating a need for more focused running training. Interval training can help improve her running speed and endurance. This involves alternating between high-intensity and low-intensity running periods. For instance, she could try running at a fast pace for one minute, then walking or jogging slowly for two minutes, repeating this cycle for 30 minutes.
Wall Balls: Eimear's time in this segment was significantly slower than average. To improve, she could incorporate more functional training exercises into her routine, such as squats, lunges, and kettlebell swings. She should also practice the wall ball exercise itself, focusing on maintaining a steady rhythm and using her legs to power the movement.
Burpees Broad Jump: This was another segment where Eimear was slower than average. Plyometric exercises can help improve her performance in this area. These include box jumps, jump squats, and of course, burpees with broad jumps. The key is to focus on explosive power and quick transitions between repetitions.
Race Strategies:
Going forward, Eimear should consider pacing herself more evenly throughout the race. Starting too fast can lead to early fatigue and slower times in later segments. She could try setting a steady, sustainable pace in the first running segment, then maintaining this pace throughout. It might also be beneficial to focus more on the roxzone, as this is where she had the potential to make significant time gains. She could practice transitioning quickly and efficiently between exercises, as well as maintaining a steady heart rate during these transitions. Lastly, Eimear should continue to leverage her strength-based advantages while working to improve her running and aerobic capacity.