Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Mc Gimpsey Scott's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Mc Gimpsey Scott hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Mc Gimpsey Scott’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mc Gimpsey Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:04 | 44:26 to 43:22 | 21.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:55 | 07:25 to 06:30 | 18.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 | 05:55 to 05:09 | 15.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 03:36 to 02:53 | 14.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:53 to 02:10 | 14.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:33 | 05:30 to 04:57 | 11.2% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:00 to 04:50 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Mc Gimpsey Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:07 | 00:00 | 04:47 -01:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:07 | 04:30 -00:25 | 04:47 -01:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 07:12 | 05:07 -00:01 | 09:17 -02:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:36 | 12:18 | 03:03 +00:33 | 14:24 -02:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:11 | 15:54 | 05:36 +00:35 | 17:27 -01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:30 | 22:05 | 05:12 +00:18 | 23:03 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 27:35 | 05:35 +00:44 | 28:15 -00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:06 | 33:54 | 05:42 -01:36 | 33:50 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 38:00 | 05:47 +00:43 | 39:32 -01:32 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 44:30 | 04:54 +00:06 | 45:19 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 06:20 | 49:30 | 05:36 +00:44 | 50:13 -00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 55:50 | 02:17 +00:36 | 55:49 +00:01 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 58:43 | 05:35 +00:36 | 58:06 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:04:54 | 05:26 +00:29 | 01:03:41 +01:13 |
| Running 8 | 04:46 | 01:10:49 | 06:16 -01:30 | 01:09:07 +01:42 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:15:35 | 06:55 +00:30 | 01:15:23 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:48 | 01:29:40 | 07:22 -00:34 | 01:29:40 |
Scott Mc Gimpsey's performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX race showcased his endurance, speed, and determination as a fitness athlete. He ranked in the top 42% of all athletes and top 49% in his age group (30-34), which is commendable. His overall time of 01:29:40, and his total running time of 00:44:26, which is 00:05 faster than average, suggest a strong running profile.
Scott started the race remarkably fast, as evidenced by his first running segment being 01:37 faster than the average. His strength in running was also highlighted in his last running segment, where he again outpaced the average by 01:31. The consistency in his running suggests effective pacing and energy management throughout the race.
However, there were segments where his performance was slower than average, indicating areas for improvement. His performance in strength exercises such as Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry was slower than average, suggesting the need to focus more on strength training.
Sled Push and Sled Pull: Scott's performance in these segments was slower than the average, suggesting the need for strength improvement. Specific exercises like weighted sled drags and pulls, and pushing exercises like push-ups or bench presses could be beneficial. Additionally, incorporating High Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) into his routine could improve his power and endurance.
Farmers Carry: Scott's slower than average time in this segment indicates a need for improvement in grip strength and overall body strength. Regular grip strengthening exercises such as wrist curls and finger curls, along with compound movements like deadlifts and pull-ups, can help improve his performance.
Wall Balls: To improve his time in this strength-based exercise, Scott should consider incorporating more squats and medicine ball exercises into his training regime.
Sandbag Lunges: His slower than average time in this segment hints at a need for more lower body strength and endurance. Weighted lunges, squats, and endurance running could enhance his performance in this area.
For future races, Scott should consider adopting the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lee Tom | 2024 Turin | 01:29:46 | |
| Morgan Curtis | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:17 | |
| Williams Greg | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:31 | |
| Helbig Steven | 2019 Leipzig | 01:30:01 | |
| Harriden Bailey | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:58 | |
| Worley Sam | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:29:32 | |
| de Jong Mart | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:29:53 | |
| Tuvey Greg | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:29:23 | |
| Little Joe | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:39 | |
| Seghers Brian | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:29:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
