Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Leger Gerald's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Leger Gerald's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Leger Gerald's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Leger Gerald's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 05:04 to 03:46 | 28.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:10 | 04:53 to 03:43 | 25.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:56 | 03:04 to 02:08 | 20.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 05:15 to 04:45 | 11.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 04:28 to 04:07 | 7.7% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:34 to 04:25 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 01:49 to 01:40 | 3.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 34:16 to 34:16 | 0.0% |
| Leger Gerald | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 04:06 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:49 | 04:15 +00:13 | 04:06 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:14 | 08:17 | 04:24 -00:10 | 08:21 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 12:31 | 02:31 +00:33 | 12:45 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 04:15 | 15:35 | 04:44 -00:29 | 15:16 +00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 19:50 | 04:09 +00:44 | 20:00 -00:10 |
| Running 4 | 04:18 | 24:43 | 04:42 -00:24 | 24:09 +00:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:04 | 29:01 | 04:17 +00:47 | 28:51 +00:10 |
| Running 5 | 04:15 | 34:05 | 04:50 -00:35 | 33:08 +00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 38:20 | 04:32 +00:02 | 37:58 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:20 | 42:54 | 04:44 -00:24 | 42:30 +00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 47:14 | 01:53 -00:04 | 47:14 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 04:24 | 49:03 | 04:43 -00:19 | 49:07 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:50 | 53:27 | 04:13 -00:23 | 53:50 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 04:42 | 57:17 | 05:03 -00:21 | 58:03 -00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:01:59 | 05:21 -00:06 | 01:03:06 -01:07 |
| Roxzone | 06:40 | 01:13:48 | 05:21 +01:19 | 01:13:48 |
Gerald Leger displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX race. In the overall ranking, he was in the top 49% and in his age group (55-59), he ranked second. This is a solid performance showing he is competitive within his age group. His total running time was faster than average, indicating that he has a strong runner profile. His pacing was consistently faster than average in all running segments, suggesting that he started the race at a good pace and maintained it throughout.
Given Gerald's strong running profile, he should leverage this strength during the race. He can aim to gain time in the running segments to compensate for slower exercise zones. Additionally, working on pacing strategies can help him maintain a consistent speed throughout the race, preventing fatigue in the later stages. Lastly, focusing on efficient transitions between running and exercise zones can minimize time spent in the Roxzone.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis Christian | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:33 | |
| Restuccia Nicolo | 2023 Milan | 01:13:56 | |
| Usher Matthew | 2024 Manchester | 01:13:51 | |
| Dillon Shannon | 2024 Melbourne | 01:13:31 | |
| Renault Sébastien | 2023 Paris | 01:14:16 | |
| Guidetti Giovanni | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:28 | |
| Feld Matt | 2024 Manchester | 01:14:03 | |
| Wiseman Michael | 2024 Manchester | 01:13:30 | |
| Martin Connor | 2023 Manchester | 01:13:44 | |
| Kruppa Jan | 2024 Sydney | 01:13:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Marseille | 01:13:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
