Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kruger Brad's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kruger Brad's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kruger Brad's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kruger Brad's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:37 | 41:44 to 38:07 | 51.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 03:00 | 04:48 to 01:48 | 42.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 04:15 to 04:02 | 3.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:25 to 04:12 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:02 to 03:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Kruger Brad | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 04:38 | 04:19 -00:12 | 04:18 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 08:45 | 04:37 -00:07 | 08:37 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 01:40 | 13:15 | 02:39 -00:59 | 13:14 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:43 | 14:55 | 04:59 -00:16 | 15:53 -00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 19:38 | 04:25 -00:10 | 20:52 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 23:53 | 04:58 -00:10 | 25:17 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:02 | 28:41 | 04:36 -01:34 | 30:15 -01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 31:43 | 05:06 +00:14 | 34:51 -03:08 |
| Rowing | 04:15 | 37:03 | 04:38 -00:23 | 39:57 -02:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:35 | 41:18 | 04:59 +00:36 | 44:35 -03:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:48 | 46:53 | 01:59 +02:49 | 49:34 -02:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 51:41 | 04:58 +00:48 | 51:33 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 57:27 | 04:32 -00:07 | 56:31 +00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:01:52 | 05:26 +01:01 | 01:01:03 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 04:34 | 01:08:19 | 05:42 -01:08 | 01:06:29 +01:50 |
| Roxzone | 05:19 | 01:18:04 | 05:53 -00:34 | 01:18:04 |
Brad Kruger's performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race was commendable, finishing in the top 15% overall and top 19% in his age group. His overall time of 01:18:04 demonstrates a strong capacity in hybrid fitness events. While he excelled in strength-based activities like the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump, his running segments were notably slower, indicating room for improvement in aerobic endurance. Brad's total running time was 02:00 slower than average, suggesting a need to focus on running efficiency and speed endurance. His pacing throughout the running segments was consistent, though slightly slower than the average in the latter stages, pointing to potential fatigue or energy management issues. This analysis suggests that Brad has a hybrid profile with a stronger emphasis on strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Leutzsch Sascha | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:17:55 | |
| Theisen Marco | 2023 München | 01:18:33 | |
| Pyne Colm | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:44 | |
| Le Vaillant Nicolas | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:17:40 | |
| Smigelski Spike | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:17 | |
| Dandal Jaunach | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:17:35 | |
| Schürmann Philipp | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:18:13 | |
| Pfahl Joshua | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:33 | |
| Parker John | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:07 | |
| Charltonlittle Jamie | 2023 London | 01:18:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
