Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hind Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hind Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hind Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hind Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:54 | 50:22 to 44:28 | 96.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:29 to 05:21 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:19 to 02:14 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Hind Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:23 | 00:00 | 04:49 -00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 04:23 | 04:33 -00:23 | 04:49 -00:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 08:33 | 05:19 +00:35 | 09:22 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 14:27 | 03:08 -00:39 | 14:41 -00:14 |
| Running 3 | 06:40 | 16:56 | 05:47 +00:53 | 17:49 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 23:36 | 05:23 -01:35 | 23:36 +00:00 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 27:24 | 05:46 +00:31 | 28:59 -01:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:24 | 33:41 | 05:59 -01:35 | 34:45 -01:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 38:05 | 05:58 +00:07 | 40:44 -02:39 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 44:10 | 04:58 -00:16 | 46:42 -02:32 |
| Running 6 | 07:13 | 48:52 | 05:48 +01:25 | 51:40 -02:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 56:05 | 02:22 -00:03 | 57:28 -01:23 |
| Running 7 | 06:44 | 58:24 | 05:46 +00:58 | 59:50 -01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 01:05:08 | 05:35 -00:06 | 01:05:36 -00:28 |
| Running 8 | 07:10 | 01:10:37 | 06:33 +00:37 | 01:11:11 -00:34 |
| Wall Balls | 04:33 | 01:17:47 | 07:14 -02:41 | 01:17:44 +00:03 |
| Roxzone | 10:28 | 01:32:39 | 07:41 +02:47 | 01:32:39 |
Based on the splits analysis, Matthew showed strength in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls segments. These segments were completed faster than the average time, indicating proficiency in these exercises.
However, there were several segments where Matthew lost time compared to the average. These include Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8. These segments should be the focus of his training to improve his overall race performance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to address his areas of improvement, Matthew Hind can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. With a focus on improving running endurance and speed, optimizing transitions, and maintaining a balanced training program, he can continue to excel in his age group and overall rankings.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Klein Kyle | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:02 | |
| Bainbridge Steven | 2022 Birmingham | 01:33:04 | |
| Taxy Guillaume | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:32:59 | |
| Bogacz Jeff | 2020 Dallas | 01:32:20 | |
| Oikonomou Zafeiris | 2024 Rimini | 01:32:58 | |
| Uwihs Bastian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:47 | |
| Fillbrandt Tobias | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:33:05 | |
| Vantha Khemanorak | 2023 München | 01:32:48 | |
| OBrien Mark | 2024 Sydney | 01:32:35 | |
| De Vos Raymon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:00 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:26:26 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:57 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
