Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hewitt Cole's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hewitt Cole's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hewitt Cole's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hewitt Cole's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:29 | 43:58 to 41:29 | 69.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:05 | 07:06 to 06:01 | 30.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:42 to 02:41 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Hewitt Cole | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:38 | 00:00 | 04:36 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:38 | 04:26 -00:09 | 04:36 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 09:55 | 04:57 -00:02 | 09:02 +00:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:50 | 02:53 -00:11 | 13:59 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 17:32 | 05:23 -00:15 | 16:52 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 22:40 | 04:55 -00:58 | 22:15 +00:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 26:37 | 05:21 -00:01 | 27:10 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:33 | 31:57 | 05:18 -00:45 | 32:31 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 36:30 | 05:31 +00:09 | 37:49 -01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 42:10 | 04:49 -00:21 | 43:20 -01:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 46:38 | 05:23 +00:11 | 48:09 -01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 52:12 | 02:11 -00:15 | 53:32 -01:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:19 | 54:08 | 05:22 -00:03 | 55:43 -01:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:36 | 59:27 | 05:06 -00:30 | 01:01:05 -01:38 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:04:03 | 05:58 +00:29 | 01:06:11 -02:08 |
| Wall Balls | 07:06 | 01:10:30 | 06:31 +00:35 | 01:12:09 -01:39 |
| Roxzone | 07:58 | 01:25:27 | 06:47 +01:11 | 01:25:27 |
Cole Hewitt displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham event, ranking within the Top 41% of all athletes and in the Top 45% in his age group. However, there are areas where strategic improvements can be made.
While Cole's total running time was slightly slower than average, his performance in the individual running segments varied. He performed particularly well in Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 7, where he clocked times faster than the average. However, he was slower in Running 1 and Running 5 segments, indicating a potential need for pacing adjustments.
Interestingly, Cole showed notable strength in non-running segments. His fastest segments were Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Burpees Broad Jump, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges. This indicates that Cole may have a more strength-oriented profile.
To enhance his race performance, Cole should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kosatik Filip | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:43 | |
| Weislo Thomas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:16 | |
| Hall Chris | 2023 London | 01:25:46 | |
| Clarke Anthony | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:25:19 | |
| Stiemer Tom | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:11 | |
| King Rob | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:18 | |
| Riva Guido | 2024 Milan | 01:25:29 | |
| Salt Jamie | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:24 | |
| Ginesi Paul | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:22 | |
| Fynn Ashley | 2024 Manchester | 01:25:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
