Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Hannover using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gläsener Marcus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gläsener Marcus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gläsener Marcus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gläsener Marcus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:31 | 05:55 to 04:24 | 32.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:06 | 05:41 to 04:35 | 23.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:53 | 03:27 to 02:34 | 19.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:31 | 04:50 to 04:19 | 11.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:22 to 01:57 | 9.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 05:54 to 05:42 | 4.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:59 to 39:59 | 0.0% |
| Gläsener Marcus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 05:01 | 04:24 +00:26 | 04:29 +00:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 09:51 | 04:51 -00:10 | 08:53 +00:58 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 14:32 | 02:49 +00:38 | 13:44 +00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 17:59 | 05:14 +00:00 | 16:33 +01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:55 | 23:13 | 04:45 +01:10 | 21:47 +01:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 29:08 | 05:12 +00:13 | 26:32 +02:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:36 | 34:33 | 05:02 -01:26 | 31:44 +02:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 38:09 | 05:22 +00:07 | 36:46 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 43:38 | 04:45 -00:07 | 42:08 +01:30 |
| Running 6 | 04:54 | 48:16 | 05:14 -00:20 | 46:53 +01:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 53:10 | 02:07 +00:15 | 52:07 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 04:54 | 55:32 | 05:13 -00:19 | 54:14 +01:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:41 | 01:00:26 | 04:52 +00:49 | 59:27 +00:59 |
| Running 8 | 04:23 | 01:06:07 | 05:44 -01:21 | 01:04:19 +01:48 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:10:30 | 06:13 -00:19 | 01:10:03 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:22 | 01:22:40 | 06:24 -00:02 | 01:22:40 |
In terms of his profile, Marcus seems to have a balanced approach to the race. His total running time of 00:39:59 indicates that he has a solid running ability. However, it is worth noting that his running 1 and ski erg segments were slightly slower than average, suggesting that he could benefit from additional running training. On the other hand, his sled push and burpees broad jump segments were faster than average, indicating that he excels in strength-related exercises.
Overall, Marcus Gläsener had a strong performance in the 2020 Hannover Hyrox race. By focusing on the identified areas of improvement and implementing the suggested training strategies, he can continue to enhance his performance and strive for even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gorman Steve | 2024 Manchester | 01:22:59 | |
| Teli Hamel | 2024 London | 01:23:04 | |
| Kontar Ayoub | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:22:11 | |
| Cassonnet Vassily | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:21 | |
| Meenagh Kevin | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:42 | |
| Marcou Sebastien | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:33 | |
| Steuble Roman | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:52 | |
| M Pringle Gregory | 2022 London | 01:22:29 | |
| Häußler Simon | 2023 Hannover | 01:22:51 | |
| Bartsch Oliver | 2024 Köln | 01:23:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
