Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 493 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Foley Nigel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Foley Nigel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Foley Nigel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Foley Nigel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:53 | 06:56 to 05:03 | 36.7% |
| Run Total | 01:29 | 41:01 to 39:32 | 28.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 05:14 to 04:22 | 16.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 07:36 to 06:44 | 16.9% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:35 to 04:33 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Foley Nigel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:02 | 00:00 | 04:17 -01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 03:02 | 04:14 -00:12 | 04:17 -01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:22 | 07:04 | 04:40 +00:42 | 08:31 -01:27 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 12:26 | 03:51 -00:48 | 13:11 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 15:29 | 05:08 +00:20 | 17:02 -01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 20:57 | 06:35 -00:46 | 22:10 -01:13 |
| Running 4 | 05:44 | 26:46 | 05:09 +00:35 | 28:45 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 32:30 | 04:35 +00:39 | 33:54 -01:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 37:44 | 05:14 +00:34 | 38:29 -00:45 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:32 | 04:36 -00:01 | 43:43 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 48:07 | 05:07 +00:39 | 48:19 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 53:53 | 02:20 -00:18 | 53:26 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 55:55 | 05:12 +00:41 | 55:46 +00:09 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:56 | 01:01:48 | 05:17 +01:39 | 01:00:58 +00:50 |
| Running 8 | 04:01 | 01:08:44 | 05:45 -01:44 | 01:06:15 +02:29 |
| Wall Balls | 07:36 | 01:12:45 | 07:00 +00:36 | 01:12:00 +00:45 |
| Roxzone | 04:53 | 01:25:06 | 06:06 -01:13 | 01:25:06 |
Nigel Foley, competing in the HYROX PRO category, displayed a commendable performance. He secured an overall rank of 118, landing him in the top 40% of 289 athletes. In his age group, 35-39, he ranked 32, placing him in the top 47% of 68 athletes. His total running time was 00:41:01, which was 00:26 slower than average, suggesting that his strength lies more in the strength exercises than in running. However, his best running lap completed in 00:04:01 indicates a potential for speed, which could be harnessed with appropriate training.
In terms of pacing, Nigel started off the race strong, with his running 1 segment being faster than the average time. However, as the race progressed, he consistently lost some time in the running segments, indicating a possible need for better endurance training. His Roxzone time was faster than average, suggesting that he recovers relatively quickly, which is a positive trait for this type of competition.
Given the above analysis, it is advisable for Nigel to work on pacing himself more effectively during the race, starting strong but also saving enough energy to maintain a steady pace in the later stages of the race. The faster Roxzone time suggests that Nigel recovers quickly, so he can afford to push himself a little harder on the strength exercises without worrying too much about the recovery time. He should also focus on improving his transition times between exercises to shave off valuable seconds. Finally, with targeted training on his weaker segments, Nigel can turn these into strengths to improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Simpkins Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:22 | |
| Rice Gareth | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:36 | |
| Edwards Jessie | 2023 Melbourne | 01:25:21 | |
| Robson Greg | 2024 Dubai | 01:24:48 | |
| Kukan Donald | 2024 New York | 01:24:59 | |
| Burgess Thomas | 2023 London | 01:25:29 | |
| Okerson Wesley | 2020 Dallas | 01:24:58 | |
| Blago Michele | 2024 Köln | 01:25:33 | |
| Kegler Peter | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:25:14 | |
| Beattie Zack | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:48:49 | |
| 2024 Gdansk | 01:23:55 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:22 | |
| 2024 London | 01:21:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
