Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fleming James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fleming James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fleming James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fleming James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:29 | 06:54 to 05:25 | 27.1% |
| Run Total | 01:29 | 40:33 to 39:04 | 27.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:53 | 05:15 to 04:22 | 16.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 02:55 to 02:26 | 8.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:23 | 04:35 to 04:12 | 7.0% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 04:55 to 04:35 | 6.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:13 | 04:38 to 04:25 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:27 to 04:15 | 3.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Fleming James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:44 | 00:00 | 04:21 -01:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 02:44 | 04:21 +00:06 | 04:21 -01:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 07:11 | 04:43 +00:07 | 08:42 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 12:01 | 02:43 +00:12 | 13:25 -01:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 14:56 | 05:05 +00:33 | 16:08 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 20:34 | 04:32 +00:03 | 21:13 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 25:09 | 05:05 +00:27 | 25:45 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:38 | 30:41 | 04:48 -00:10 | 30:50 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 35:19 | 05:13 +00:19 | 35:38 -00:19 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 40:51 | 04:40 +00:15 | 40:51 +00:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 45:46 | 05:06 +00:15 | 45:31 +00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 51:07 | 02:02 -00:13 | 50:37 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:32 | 52:56 | 05:05 +00:27 | 52:39 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 58:28 | 04:40 +00:35 | 57:44 +00:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 01:03:43 | 05:33 -00:04 | 01:02:24 +01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:54 | 01:09:12 | 05:55 +00:59 | 01:07:57 +01:15 |
| Roxzone | 04:02 | 01:19:59 | 06:07 -02:05 | 01:19:59 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on James' splits, it appears that he has a more balanced profile, as his splits are generally within a reasonable range of the average times. However, his total running time of 00:40:33 is 01:42 slower than average, indicating that he could benefit from improving his running performance. It is important for James to focus on both his overall fitness and his transition time in order to improve his performance in the roxzone.
In conclusion, James Fleming had a strong performance in the 2023 Dublin Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, specifically in the identified segments, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanchez Sanz David | 2023 Valencia | 01:19:56 | |
| Schienmann Christian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:20:23 | |
| Ellis Andrew | 2023 London | 01:20:12 | |
| Croft Jack | 2023 Dublin | 01:19:42 | |
| Metcalfe Stephen | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:30 | |
| Staples Peter | 2022 Birmingham | 01:19:33 | |
| Mcdowell Ryan | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:23 | |
| Kling Bram | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:33 | |
| Lecoy Frederic | 2024 Paris | 01:20:19 | |
| Andreoli Luca | 2023 London | 01:20:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Malmö | 01:25:03 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:06:58 | |
| 2024 Dublin | 01:06:30 | |
| 2024 Madrid | 01:13:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
