Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| BBJ | 01:57 (From 07:42 to 05:45) | 33.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:19 (From 08:14 to 06:55) | 22.8% |
| Run Total | 00:52 (From 45:43 to 44:51) | 15.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 (From 03:36 to 03:03) | 9.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 (From 05:44 to 05:13) | 9.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 (From 05:47 to 05:26) | 6.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 (From 02:29 to 02:16) | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:26 to 04:26) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:44 to 04:44) | 0.0% |
| Cockfield Neil | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:11 | 00:00 | 04:52 +01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 06:11 | 04:33 -00:07 | 04:52 +01:19 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 10:37 | 05:18 +00:05 | 09:25 +01:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:36 | 16:00 | 03:08 +00:28 | 14:43 +01:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 19:36 | 05:46 -00:14 | 17:51 +01:45 |
| Sled Pull | 05:44 | 25:08 | 05:26 +00:18 | 23:37 +01:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 30:52 | 05:47 -00:15 | 29:03 +01:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:42 | 36:24 | 06:02 +01:40 | 34:50 +01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:38 | 44:06 | 05:59 -00:21 | 40:52 +03:14 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 49:44 | 04:58 -00:14 | 46:51 +02:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 54:28 | 05:49 -00:18 | 51:49 +02:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 59:59 | 02:21 +00:08 | 57:38 +02:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:38 | 01:02:28 | 05:48 -00:10 | 59:59 +02:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:08:06 | 05:38 +00:09 | 01:05:47 +02:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:13:53 | 06:35 -00:13 | 01:11:25 +02:28 |
| Wall Balls | 08:14 | 01:20:15 | 07:19 +00:55 | 01:18:00 +02:15 |
| Roxzone | 04:47 | 01:33:10 | 07:51 -03:04 | 01:33:10 |
Neil's total running time was 00:45:43, which was 01:21 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and endurance. His best running lap was 00:05:23, which shows potential in his running ability.
To improve performance in the Burpees Broad Jump segment, Neil should focus on increasing his explosive power and agility. Plyometric exercises such as box jumps, squat jumps, and burpees can help improve his power output. Additionally, practicing the broad jump technique and focusing on proper form and efficiency will also be beneficial.
In the Running 1 segment, Neil was 01:30 slower than average. To improve this, he should incorporate interval training and speed work into his running routine. This can include tempo runs, interval sprints, and hill repeats. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, Neil can significantly reduce the time lost in this segment.
The Wall Balls segment was another area where Neil struggled, being 00:54 slower than average. To enhance his performance in this exercise, Neil should work on improving his upper body and core strength. Exercises such as shoulder presses, push-ups, and Russian twists can help strengthen the muscles required for wall balls. Practicing the proper technique and focusing on accuracy and efficiency will also be beneficial.
Additionally, Neil should make sure to prioritize transitions between exercises (Roxzone). By improving his overall fitness and reducing transition times, he can gain an advantage over his competitors. Incorporating circuit training and practicing quick transitions between exercises can help improve his overall efficiency.
Lastly, Neil should consider incorporating specific training sessions that mimic the demands of the Hyrox race. This can include combining running with strength exercises, such as circuit training or interval workouts. By training in a similar format to the race, Neil can better prepare his body for the specific challenges he will face.
Overall, Neil Cockfield had a solid performance in the 2023 Manchester Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, addressing the areas where he lost the most time, and implementing effective race strategies, Neil can continue to enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tilley Eamonn | 2023 Dublin | 01:33:34 | |
| Legien Rene | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:02 | |
| Morgan Mark | 2023 Wien | 01:33:06 | |
| Scott Walter | 2023 London | 01:32:42 | |
| Sivera Bastien | 2024 Mexico City | 01:33:07 | |
| Frątczak Dariusz | 2024 Poznan | 01:32:56 | |
| Schlünzen Mike | 2018 Hamburg | 01:33:08 | |
| Knox James | 2023 Dublin | 01:32:46 | |
| Summerfield Thomas | 2024 London | 01:33:12 | |
| Yatco Jeremy | 2024 Toronto | 01:32:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Cockfield Neil
