Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Blakemore Holly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Blakemore Holly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Blakemore Holly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Blakemore Holly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:01 | 03:15 to 02:14 | 27.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:53 | 05:47 to 04:54 | 23.5% |
| Run Total | 00:47 | 47:53 to 47:06 | 20.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 03:16 to 02:45 | 13.7% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:44 to 05:25 | 8.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 06:33 to 06:18 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Blakemore Holly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 05:17 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 04:59 | 05:12 -00:16 | 05:17 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:39 | 09:55 | 05:44 -00:05 | 10:29 -00:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 15:34 | 02:51 +00:25 | 16:13 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 18:50 | 06:03 -00:14 | 19:04 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 24:39 | 06:04 -00:22 | 25:07 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 30:21 | 06:03 -00:01 | 31:11 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:33 | 36:23 | 06:37 -00:04 | 37:14 -00:51 |
| Running 5 | 06:11 | 42:56 | 06:13 -00:02 | 43:51 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 05:44 | 49:07 | 05:29 +00:15 | 50:04 -00:57 |
| Running 6 | 06:20 | 54:51 | 06:05 +00:15 | 55:33 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:15 | 01:01:11 | 02:22 +00:53 | 01:01:38 -00:27 |
| Running 7 | 06:04 | 01:04:26 | 06:05 -00:01 | 01:04:00 +00:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:10:30 | 05:06 +00:41 | 01:10:05 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:52 | 01:16:17 | 06:34 +00:18 | 01:15:11 +01:06 |
| Wall Balls | 04:19 | 01:23:09 | 05:23 -01:04 | 01:21:45 +01:24 |
| Roxzone | 07:14 | 01:34:33 | 07:25 -00:11 | 01:34:33 |
Blakemore's overall time was 01:34:33, with a total running time of 00:47:53. Her total running time was 01:12 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may need to focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to improve her performance in the race.
Blakemore's best running lap was 00:04:59, which was 00:07 faster than the average. This suggests that she has a strong running ability and should continue to focus on improving her running performance.
Overall, Blakemore has shown strong performance in the HYROX race, particularly in the running segments. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, transitioning time, and specific areas of weakness identified in the analysis, she can further enhance her performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lynes Julie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:05 | |
| Doyle Niamh | 2024 Dublin | 01:34:23 | |
| Delia Sophie | 2024 Köln | 01:34:24 | |
| Lam Stefanie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:41 | |
| Macagnone Christa | 2019 New York | 01:34:06 | |
| Kavelaar Mariska | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:03 | |
| Spence Emma | 2024 Perth | 01:34:45 | |
| Stock Lara | 2022 Bremen | 01:34:09 | |
| Burns Anna | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:03 | |
| Kirchner Daniela | 2022 Essen | 01:35:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Manchester | 01:36:52 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:36:29 | |
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
