Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bishop Conah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bishop Conah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bishop Conah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bishop Conah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:43 | 06:33 to 04:50 | 53.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 05:08 to 04:31 | 19.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 06:17 to 05:53 | 12.4% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:55 to 04:42 | 6.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:55 to 04:42 | 6.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:42 to 02:38 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:12 to 39:12 | 0.0% |
| Bishop Conah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:24 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:57 | 04:25 -00:06 | 04:33 +00:24 |
| Running 2 | 04:16 | 09:16 | 04:53 -00:37 | 08:58 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 13:32 | 02:52 -00:10 | 13:51 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 16:14 | 05:19 -00:22 | 16:43 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 21:11 | 04:50 +00:18 | 22:02 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 26:19 | 05:17 -00:32 | 26:52 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:33 | 31:04 | 05:11 +01:22 | 32:09 -01:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:01 | 37:37 | 05:27 -00:26 | 37:20 +00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 42:38 | 04:47 +00:08 | 42:47 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 47:33 | 05:18 -00:15 | 47:34 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 52:36 | 02:09 -00:25 | 52:52 -00:16 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 54:20 | 05:17 -00:25 | 55:01 -00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 59:12 | 04:59 -00:04 | 01:00:18 -01:06 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:04:07 | 05:52 -00:28 | 01:05:17 -01:10 |
| Wall Balls | 06:17 | 01:09:31 | 06:17 +00:00 | 01:11:09 -01:38 |
| Roxzone | 08:25 | 01:24:05 | 06:39 +01:46 | 01:24:05 |
Conah Bishop, competing in the age group 25-29, had an impressive run in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. Among 4107 athletes, Conah finished in the top 30% with an overall rank of 1264, and ranked in the top 35% of his age group. His overall time was 01:24:05.
Significantly, Conah's total running time was 00:39:12, which is 02:58 faster than the average running time. This indicates that Conah possesses strong running skills, which is a key strength to his performance. He also excelled in most of the running segments, consistently finishing faster than the average time.
However, Conah's performance in the Roxzone segment was slower than average, indicating that he may have rested more or experienced difficulty with transitions. Additionally, his performance in the early running segment was slower than the average, suggesting that he may have started the race at a slower pace.
Considering Conah's performance, a few race strategies could be implemented for better results:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Malorny Alexander | 2019 Leipzig | 01:24:19 | |
| Russell Dylan | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:47 | |
| Issa Julian | 2023 Valencia | 01:23:57 | |
| Zeidler Alex | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:07 | |
| Huteson Charlie | 2024 London | 01:24:20 | |
| Mullin Lee | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:49 | |
| Walhout Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:42 | |
| Farina Davide | 2024 Milan | 01:23:46 | |
| Von Appen Jan | 2022 Hamburg | 01:24:27 | |
| Mckaig Scott | 2024 Manchester | 01:24:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
