Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Rietschoten Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Rietschoten Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Rietschoten Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Rietschoten Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 12:36 | 01:01:43 to 49:07 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Van Rietschoten Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:56 | 00:00 | 05:13 -01:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 03:56 | 04:42 -00:37 | 05:13 -01:17 |
| Running 2 | 08:31 | 08:01 | 05:46 +02:45 | 09:55 -01:54 |
| Sled Push | 01:34 | 16:32 | 03:29 -01:55 | 15:41 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 08:45 | 18:06 | 06:22 +02:23 | 19:10 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 26:51 | 06:02 -01:20 | 25:32 +01:19 |
| Running 4 | 08:42 | 31:33 | 06:21 +02:21 | 31:34 -00:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 40:15 | 06:54 -01:26 | 37:55 +02:20 |
| Running 5 | 09:15 | 45:43 | 06:37 +02:38 | 44:49 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 54:58 | 05:14 -00:27 | 51:26 +03:32 |
| Running 6 | 08:49 | 59:45 | 06:23 +02:26 | 56:40 +03:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:08:34 | 02:36 -00:38 | 01:03:03 +05:31 |
| Running 7 | 06:23 | 01:10:32 | 06:23 +00:00 | 01:05:39 +04:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:18 | 01:16:55 | 06:28 -02:10 | 01:12:02 +04:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:26 | 01:21:13 | 07:36 -00:10 | 01:18:30 +02:43 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:28:39 | 08:27 -03:25 | 01:26:06 +02:33 |
| Roxzone | 10:13 | 01:43:44 | 09:11 +01:02 | 01:43:44 |
Nick Van Rietschoten's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race showcased a strong proficiency in strength-based exercises but highlighted areas for improvement in running. Despite finishing in the top 61% overall, his total running time was 10:37 slower than the average, indicating a need to enhance his running efficiency. Notably, his initial running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting a tendency to start too quickly, which may have contributed to a decline in pace during later running segments. Nick's strength in exercises like the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Wall Balls indicates a strong power and endurance profile, aligning more with strength rather than running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ende Rick | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:43:26 | |
| Reinke Felix | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:44:07 | |
| Weller Aaron | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:43:53 | |
| Chiodi Paolo | 2024 Turin | 01:43:34 | |
| Voysey Robert | 2024 New York | 01:44:14 | |
| Loriguet PierreEmmanuel | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:43:14 | |
| Herrera Prieto José Arturo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:43:28 | |
| Griggs Markus | 2021 London | 01:43:18 | |
| Trafieri Simeoni Federico | 2024 Turin | 01:43:48 | |
| Dixon James | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:43:34 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
