Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sharlott Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sharlott Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sharlott Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sharlott Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:56 | 07:47 to 05:51 | 44.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:37 | 08:39 to 07:02 | 36.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:30 to 03:05 | 9.5% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:13 to 04:57 | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:42 to 04:33 | 3.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:04 to 43:04 | 0.0% |
| Sharlott Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:52 | 00:00 | 04:54 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:52 | 04:33 +00:09 | 04:54 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 10:34 | 05:21 -00:19 | 09:27 +01:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 15:36 | 03:12 +00:18 | 14:48 +00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 19:06 | 05:51 -00:32 | 18:00 +01:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 24:25 | 05:29 -00:23 | 23:51 +00:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 29:31 | 05:50 -00:30 | 29:20 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:47 | 34:51 | 06:07 +01:40 | 35:10 -00:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:34 | 42:38 | 06:03 -00:29 | 41:17 +01:21 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 48:12 | 05:00 +00:13 | 47:20 +00:52 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 53:25 | 05:53 -00:38 | 52:20 +01:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 58:40 | 02:23 -00:06 | 58:13 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 01:00:57 | 05:51 -00:43 | 01:00:36 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:06:05 | 05:42 -01:13 | 01:06:27 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:10:34 | 06:41 -01:04 | 01:12:09 -01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 08:39 | 01:16:11 | 07:24 +01:15 | 01:18:50 -02:39 |
| Roxzone | 09:25 | 01:34:08 | 07:54 +01:31 | 01:34:08 |
Matt Sharlott demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX Race. Particularly notable was his total running time, clocking in at 00:43:04, which is 03:39 faster than the average. This suggests that Matt has a strong runner's profile and performed excellently in the running segments of the race. However, his roxzone time was slower than average, indicating the need to work on improving his overall fitness and transition times. Matt's pacing seemed to improve as the race progressed, with better-than-average times in the later running segments.
Moving forward, Matt should consider the following strategies to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bazemore Chris | 2024 Dallas | 01:34:26 | |
| Garduno Angeles Jose Abraham | 2024 Mexico City | 01:33:41 | |
| Wegener Bernd | 2024 Berlin | 01:33:53 | |
| Eckelhart Sebastian | 2023 München | 01:34:09 | |
| Stokes Elliott | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:06 | |
| Van Rooijen Jasper | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:21 | |
| Karp Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:48 | |
| Horber Baptiste | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:34:12 | |
| Brown Nicky | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:41 | |
| Cedervi Niclas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:32:06 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
