Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 283 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schuijt Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schuijt Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schuijt Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schuijt Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:08 | 01:04:41 to 55:33 | 78.2% |
| Ski Erg | 01:10 | 06:09 to 04:59 | 10.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 05:05 to 04:13 | 7.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:29 | 08:44 to 08:15 | 4.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 07:12 to 07:10 | 0.3% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:56 to 07:56 | 0.0% |
| Schuijt Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:03 | 00:00 | 05:57 +01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:09 | 07:03 | 04:59 +01:10 | 05:57 +01:06 |
| Running 2 | 09:01 | 13:12 | 06:27 +02:34 | 10:56 +02:16 |
| Sled Push | 05:05 | 22:13 | 04:11 +00:54 | 17:23 +04:50 |
| Running 3 | 07:23 | 27:18 | 07:22 +00:01 | 21:34 +05:44 |
| Sled Pull | 07:12 | 34:41 | 07:10 +00:02 | 28:56 +05:45 |
| Running 4 | 08:04 | 41:53 | 07:20 +00:44 | 36:06 +05:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:44 | 49:57 | 08:46 -00:02 | 43:26 +06:31 |
| Running 5 | 07:53 | 58:41 | 07:47 +00:06 | 52:12 +06:29 |
| Rowing | 05:18 | 01:06:34 | 05:38 -00:20 | 59:59 +06:35 |
| Running 6 | 07:59 | 01:11:52 | 07:27 +00:32 | 01:05:37 +06:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 01:19:51 | 03:01 -00:23 | 01:13:04 +06:47 |
| Running 7 | 08:16 | 01:22:29 | 07:26 +00:50 | 01:16:05 +06:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 01:30:45 | 08:25 -02:39 | 01:23:31 +07:14 |
| Running 8 | 09:05 | 01:36:31 | 09:38 -00:33 | 01:31:56 +04:35 |
| Wall Balls | 07:56 | 01:45:36 | 10:44 -02:48 | 01:41:34 +04:02 |
| Roxzone | 10:30 | 02:03:54 | 11:36 -01:06 | 02:03:54 |
Based on the provided splits, Marco's best running lap was 00:07:03. However, his running performance overall was slower than average, especially in Running 1, Running 2, Running 4, Running 6, and Running 7.
In conclusion, Marco Schuijt performed well in the 2024 Maastricht HYROX race. To further improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running abilities, particularly in segments where he lost the most time. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training and strength exercises for runners, will help enhance his running performance. Additionally, reducing transition times in the Roxzone and improving overall fitness will contribute to his overall performance. By implementing these strategies and maintaining a consistent pace, Marco can continue to improve his results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Koch Dominik | 2023 Köln | 02:03:44 | |
| Fornasiero Filippo | 2024 Milan | 02:03:47 | |
| Schäfer Marco | 2024 Frankfurt | 02:04:14 | |
| Cadenaro Stefano | 2023 Milan | 02:03:52 | |
| Belli Karl | 2024 Marseille | 02:04:02 | |
| Sunazawa Yuki | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:03:52 | |
| Chew Tee Pao | 2024 Singapore | 02:04:09 | |
| Foster Livingston | 2024 New York | 02:03:58 | |
| fernandez diego | 2021 Dallas | 02:03:47 | |
| Lim Leonard | 2024 Singapore | 02:04:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
