Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scheffel Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scheffel Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scheffel Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scheffel Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 07:43 to 06:30 | 33.2% |
| Run Total | 01:04 | 44:26 to 43:22 | 29.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:45 to 05:24 | 9.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:46 to 04:28 | 8.2% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:04 to 04:50 | 6.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 05:09 to 04:57 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:21 to 02:10 | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 03:00 to 02:53 | 3.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Scheffel Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 04:33 | 04:30 +00:16 | 04:47 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:16 | 09:19 | 05:06 +00:10 | 09:17 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 14:35 | 03:03 -00:03 | 14:23 +00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 17:35 | 05:35 +00:03 | 17:26 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 23:13 | 05:11 -00:02 | 23:01 +00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:44 | 28:22 | 05:34 +00:10 | 28:12 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 34:06 | 05:42 +00:03 | 33:46 +00:20 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 39:51 | 05:45 -00:04 | 39:28 +00:23 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 45:32 | 04:53 +00:11 | 45:13 +00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:41 | 50:36 | 05:35 +00:06 | 50:06 +00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 56:17 | 02:17 +00:04 | 55:41 +00:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 58:38 | 05:34 +00:05 | 57:58 +00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:04:17 | 05:24 -00:30 | 01:03:32 +00:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:09:11 | 06:16 +00:02 | 01:08:56 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 07:43 | 01:15:29 | 06:54 +00:49 | 01:15:12 +00:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:20 | 01:29:24 | 07:18 -00:58 | 01:29:24 |
Splits Analysis:
- Running 1: Marco performed excellently in this segment, finishing 5 seconds faster than the average time.
- Ski Erg: Marco took 20 seconds longer than the average time in this segment, indicating a need for improvement in his skiing technique and overall fitness.
- Running 2: Marco was 12 seconds slower than the average time in this segment. Focusing on improving his running speed and endurance would be beneficial.
- Sled Push: Marco performed exceptionally well in this segment, finishing 22 seconds faster than the average time.
- Running 3: Marco was only 2 seconds slower than the average time in this segment, indicating a relatively strong performance.
- Sled Pull: Marco was 25 seconds faster than the average time in this segment, highlighting his strength and technique in sled pulling.
- Running 4: Marco was 8 seconds slower than the average time in this segment. Improving his running speed and endurance would benefit his overall performance.
- Burpees Broad Jump: Marco took 26 seconds longer than the average time in this segment. Focusing on improving his burpee technique and explosiveness would be beneficial.
- Running 5: Marco performed well in this segment, finishing 4 seconds faster than the average time.
- Rowing: Marco took 15 seconds longer than the average time in this segment. Improving his rowing technique and overall fitness would enhance his performance.
- Running 6: Marco was 6 seconds slower than the average time in this segment. Focusing on improving his running speed and endurance would benefit him.
- Farmers Carry: Marco performed well in this segment, finishing with the same time as the average.
- Running 7: Marco was 5 seconds slower than the average time in this segment. Improving his running speed and endurance would be beneficial.
- Sandbag Lunges: Marco performed exceptionally well in this segment, finishing 25 seconds faster than the average time.
- Running 8: Marco performed well in this segment, finishing 4 seconds faster than the average time.
- Wall Balls: Marco took 51 seconds longer than the average time in this segment. Focusing on improving his wall ball technique and overall strength would be beneficial.
- Roxzone: Marco performed well in this segment, finishing 49 seconds faster than the average time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rowlands Dafydd | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:35 | |
| Breu Maximilian | 2023 München | 01:29:37 | |
| Leenders Ashley | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:06 | |
| Toulemonde Valentin | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:48 | |
| Jones Stuart | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:29:33 | |
| Fricke Rayk | 2022 Hamburg | 01:29:06 | |
| Irwin Sean | 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:52 | |
| Blei Jakob | 2018 Wien | 01:29:33 | |
| San Roman Mario | 2023 Anaheim | 01:29:29 | |
| Porcellini Fabrizio | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:29:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
