Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pryor Zack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pryor Zack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pryor Zack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pryor Zack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:17 | 58:42 to 49:25 | 97.9% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:23 to 05:11 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:51 to 07:51 | 0.0% |
| Pryor Zack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:12 | 00:00 | 05:15 +01:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 07:12 | 04:43 -00:09 | 05:15 +01:57 |
| Running 2 | 07:04 | 11:46 | 05:46 +01:18 | 09:58 +01:48 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 18:50 | 03:29 -01:29 | 15:44 +03:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 20:50 | 06:22 -00:08 | 19:13 +01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:32 | 27:04 | 06:05 -01:33 | 25:35 +01:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 31:36 | 06:20 -00:04 | 31:40 -00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:17 | 37:52 | 06:58 -01:41 | 38:00 -00:08 |
| Running 5 | 07:47 | 43:09 | 06:37 +01:10 | 44:58 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 50:56 | 05:13 +00:10 | 51:35 -00:39 |
| Running 6 | 07:08 | 56:19 | 06:24 +00:44 | 56:48 -00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 01:03:27 | 02:36 -00:14 | 01:03:12 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 06:46 | 01:05:49 | 06:25 +00:21 | 01:05:48 +00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:12:35 | 06:31 -01:13 | 01:12:13 +00:22 |
| Running 8 | 10:18 | 01:17:53 | 07:35 +02:43 | 01:18:44 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 07:51 | 01:28:11 | 08:32 -00:41 | 01:26:19 +01:52 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:44:05 | 09:14 -01:04 | 01:44:05 |
Zack Pryor demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race, finishing in the top 53% of athletes overall and the top 60% in his age group. His strengths were evident in strength exercises, particularly the sled push and sled pull, where he ranked in the top 2% and 7% respectively. However, his total running time was 7:28 slower than the average, indicating a need for focused improvement in running efficiency. Notably, Zack's pacing suggests he started slower than average, particularly in the early running segments, which may have impacted his overall running time. Based on his performance, Zack has a stronger profile in strength activities but needs to enhance his running capabilities to achieve a more balanced and hybrid athletic profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Horner Steven | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:44:11 | |
| Henderson Steven | 2023 London | 01:44:17 | |
| Pagliuso Gianpaolo | 2023 Rimini | 01:43:48 | |
| Robianto Imam | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:44:21 | |
| Bell Noah | 2024 Stockholm | 01:43:49 | |
| Wayman Leroy | 2023 Chicago | 01:43:53 | |
| Wunderle Michael | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:44:02 | |
| Johnson Chris | 2024 Dallas | 01:44:33 | |
| 张 伟楠 | 2024 Beijing | 01:44:02 | |
| Schultz David | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:43:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
