Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Moores Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Moores Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Moores Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Moores Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:35 | 08:26 to 05:51 | 38.9% |
| Wall Balls | 02:01 | 09:03 to 07:02 | 30.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 06:24 to 05:17 | 16.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:32 | 02:50 to 02:18 | 8.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 03:27 to 03:05 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:58 to 04:57 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:39 to 41:39 | 0.0% |
| Moores Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:39 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:39 | 04:33 -00:18 | 04:52 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:54 | 05:19 -00:27 | 09:25 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 14:46 | 03:11 +00:16 | 14:44 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 18:13 | 05:49 -00:44 | 17:55 +00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 06:24 | 23:18 | 05:29 +00:55 | 23:44 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 29:42 | 05:48 -00:38 | 29:13 +00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:26 | 34:52 | 06:05 +02:21 | 35:01 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 43:18 | 06:01 -00:49 | 41:06 +02:12 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 48:30 | 04:59 -00:01 | 47:07 +01:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 53:28 | 05:51 -00:43 | 52:06 +01:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:50 | 58:36 | 02:22 +00:28 | 57:57 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 01:01:26 | 05:49 -00:35 | 01:00:19 +01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:06:40 | 05:40 -00:29 | 01:06:08 +00:32 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 01:11:51 | 06:38 -01:15 | 01:11:48 +00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 09:03 | 01:17:14 | 07:26 +01:37 | 01:18:26 -01:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:34 | 01:33:42 | 07:50 -00:16 | 01:33:42 |
Jack Moores' performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race is commendable, ranking in the top 46% of all athletes and the top 52% of his age group. What stands out significantly is his exceptional running performance. He clocked a total running time of 00:41:39, which is 04:48 faster than the average competitor. This suggests that Jack has a strong runner's profile, which he utilized well to gain time in the race. However, there is room for improvement in his strength training, as evidenced by slower-than-average times in several strength-based segments.
His pacing strategy seems to be well-calculated, as he started slower than average in Running 1, probably to conserve energy for subsequent segments. His pace picked up from Running 2 onwards, consistently clocking faster than average times, which is likely a contributing factor to his overall rank.
Considering Jack's performance and identified areas of improvement, the following strategies could be implemented for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferreira Cristiano | 2022 Valencia | 01:33:14 | |
| Da Silva Luiz | 2022 Dallas | 01:33:15 | |
| Shah Jaimin | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:05 | |
| Lutter Ben | 2024 Berlin | 01:33:41 | |
| Lecke Manuel | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:55 | |
| Johnston Andrew | 2024 Brisbane | 01:33:54 | |
| Richmond Alex | 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:52 | |
| Wahlund Jesper | 2023 Stockholm | 01:34:04 | |
| Townsend Luke | 2024 New York | 01:33:20 | |
| Amato Pierluigi | 2024 Turin | 01:33:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:30:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
