Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Marsh Adam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Marsh Adam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Marsh Adam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Marsh Adam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:13 | 41:42 to 40:29 | 44.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:45 | 05:11 to 04:26 | 27.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:26 | 06:11 to 05:45 | 15.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:51 to 02:35 | 9.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:05 | 04:48 to 04:43 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Marsh Adam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 05:19 | 04:24 -00:09 | 04:29 +00:50 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 09:34 | 04:51 -00:15 | 08:53 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 14:10 | 02:51 +00:00 | 13:44 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 17:01 | 05:14 -00:08 | 16:35 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 22:07 | 04:45 +00:26 | 21:49 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 27:18 | 05:13 +00:00 | 26:34 +00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:48 | 32:31 | 05:03 -00:15 | 31:47 +00:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:37 | 37:19 | 05:23 +00:14 | 36:50 +00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 42:56 | 04:45 -00:16 | 42:13 +00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 47:25 | 05:15 -00:07 | 46:58 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 52:33 | 02:07 -00:21 | 52:13 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 54:19 | 05:14 +00:00 | 54:20 -00:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:27 | 59:33 | 04:53 -00:26 | 59:34 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:32 | 01:04:00 | 05:45 -00:13 | 01:04:27 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:09:32 | 06:14 -00:03 | 01:10:12 -00:40 |
| Roxzone | 07:21 | 01:22:55 | 06:29 +00:52 | 01:22:55 |
Adam Marsh performed commendably in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 28% of all competing athletes and the top 32% in his age group. His overall time was 01:22:55 which is a respectable finishing time. His performance in exercises such as Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Push, and Farmers Carry was above average, with times that were faster than the average.
However, Adam's total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a need to focus more on running training. In terms of pacing, Adam started the race slower in the first running segment, yet improved significantly in subsequent segments. This shows a potential tendency to start slow and gain momentum, which could be optimized for better performance. Given his above-average performance in strength-focused activities, Adam seems to have a more balanced, hybrid profile of strength and endurance.
In future races, Adam should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Agyeman Osei | 2023 London | 01:22:27 | |
| Nicholson Alex | 2023 Dublin | 01:23:06 | |
| Tesfazghi Awet | 2023 Köln | 01:22:32 | |
| Myers Curt | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:22:25 | |
| Mierke Thomas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:22:28 | |
| Romanowski Patryk | 2024 Malaga | 01:23:24 | |
| Seares Junvie | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:28 | |
| Ueda Masatomo | 2024 Turin | 01:23:00 | |
| Löffler Kevin | 2022 Basel | 01:22:30 | |
| Zhang Henry | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
