Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lammertink Dennis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lammertink Dennis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lammertink Dennis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lammertink Dennis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:16 | 08:19 to 06:03 | 45.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:07 | 07:07 to 05:00 | 42.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 05:06 to 04:38 | 9.5% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:49 to 04:44 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:24 to 40:24 | 0.0% |
| Lammertink Dennis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:18 | 00:00 | 04:37 -00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:18 | 04:27 -00:08 | 04:37 -00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 08:37 | 04:58 -00:18 | 09:04 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 13:17 | 02:54 -00:12 | 14:02 -00:45 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 15:59 | 05:25 -00:39 | 16:56 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 05:06 | 20:45 | 04:58 +00:08 | 22:21 -01:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 25:51 | 05:23 -00:06 | 27:19 -01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:07 | 31:08 | 05:19 +01:48 | 32:42 -01:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 38:15 | 05:34 -00:15 | 38:01 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 43:34 | 04:49 +00:00 | 43:35 -00:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 48:23 | 05:26 -00:14 | 48:24 -00:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 53:35 | 02:11 -00:25 | 53:50 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 55:21 | 05:24 -00:26 | 56:01 -00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:48 | 01:00:19 | 05:06 -00:18 | 01:01:25 -01:06 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:05:07 | 06:01 -00:03 | 01:06:31 -01:24 |
| Wall Balls | 08:19 | 01:11:05 | 06:32 +01:47 | 01:12:32 -01:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:43 | 01:25:59 | 06:55 -00:12 | 01:25:59 |
Dennis Lammertink delivered a commendable performance, ranking within the top 50% of all athletes and top 54% in his age group. His total running time of 00:40:24 suggests a strong runner's profile, as it was 02:38 faster than the average time. This indicates his superior speed and endurance during running segments. The analysis of his first four running segments shows a consistent and fast pace, which indicates good stamina and pacing strategy. However, some areas need improvement to enhance his overall performance and rank.
For future races, Dennis could benefit from the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cotterhill Niall | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:58 | |
| Ryan Jake | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:13 | |
| Ziehl Marlon | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:14 | |
| Van Druten Maarten | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:28 | |
| Van Der Wal Bas | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:30 | |
| Ferrari Andrea | 2024 Rimini | 01:25:36 | |
| Oremek Sebastian | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:25:36 | |
| Bagley Devon | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:28 | |
| Westwood Chris | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:30 | |
| Breathnach Ciarán | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
