Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kühltau Andreas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kühltau Andreas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kühltau Andreas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kühltau Andreas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:57 | 47:56 to 40:59 | 90.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:38 to 04:21 | 3.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 05:07 to 04:50 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:50 to 04:42 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:15 to 01:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:37 to 03:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Kühltau Andreas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:46 | 04:25 +00:13 | 04:34 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:47 | 09:24 | 04:53 +00:54 | 08:59 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 01:15 | 15:11 | 02:52 -01:37 | 13:52 +01:19 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 16:26 | 05:19 +00:50 | 16:44 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 03:59 | 22:35 | 04:50 -00:51 | 22:03 +00:32 |
| Running 4 | 06:08 | 26:34 | 05:17 +00:51 | 26:53 -00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 32:42 | 05:11 -00:04 | 32:10 +00:32 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 37:49 | 05:27 +01:04 | 37:21 +00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 44:20 | 04:47 +00:03 | 42:48 +01:32 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 49:10 | 05:19 +01:00 | 47:35 +01:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 55:29 | 02:08 -00:18 | 52:54 +02:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 57:19 | 05:18 +00:40 | 55:02 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:37 | 01:03:17 | 04:59 -01:22 | 01:00:20 +02:57 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:06:54 | 05:53 +00:28 | 01:05:19 +01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 05:39 | 01:13:15 | 06:18 -00:39 | 01:11:12 +02:03 |
| Roxzone | 05:21 | 01:24:08 | 06:38 -01:17 | 01:24:08 |
Based on his splits analysis, it is evident that Andreas struggled with several running segments, including Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, and Running 8. These segments accounted for the most time lost during the race. Additionally, he faced challenges in the Ski Erg and Burpees Broad Jump segments.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training exercises and techniques, Andreas Kühltau can enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement. It is important for him to focus on both his running endurance and strength to excel in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Searston John | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:57 | |
| Tremaine Bryan | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:23 | |
| Tebbutt Crispin | 2023 London | 01:24:24 | |
| Mcintyre Brent | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:29 | |
| Farrell Gerard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:26 | |
| Bakkoury Ayoub | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:52 | |
| Toko Romain | 2023 Hamburg | 01:23:53 | |
| Canak Davorin | 2023 Malmö | 01:23:50 | |
| Challis Ben | 2023 Dublin | 01:23:50 | |
| Troia Christophe | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:24:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Essen | 01:37:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
