Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 470 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Irving David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Irving David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Irving David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Irving David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:44. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:04 | 12:01 to 07:57 | 41.8% |
| Wall Balls | 03:17 | 12:57 to 09:40 | 33.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:21 | 08:40 to 07:19 | 13.9% |
| Rowing | 00:37 | 06:04 to 05:27 | 6.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 05:18 to 04:56 | 3.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 03:02 to 02:59 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:36 to 06:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 49:50 to 49:50 | 0.0% |
| Irving David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:47 | 00:00 | 05:32 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:18 | 06:47 | 04:54 +00:24 | 05:32 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 12:05 | 06:17 -00:09 | 10:26 +01:39 |
| Sled Push | 03:20 | 18:13 | 03:55 -00:35 | 16:43 +01:30 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 21:33 | 07:03 -01:02 | 20:38 +00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:36 | 27:34 | 07:02 -00:26 | 27:41 -00:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:03 | 34:10 | 07:05 -01:02 | 34:43 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:01 | 40:13 | 08:18 +03:43 | 41:48 -01:35 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 52:14 | 07:28 -01:21 | 50:06 +02:08 |
| Rowing | 06:04 | 58:21 | 05:31 +00:33 | 57:34 +00:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:02 | 01:04:25 | 07:11 -01:09 | 01:03:05 +01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:02 | 01:10:27 | 02:55 +00:07 | 01:10:16 +00:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:03 | 01:13:29 | 07:19 -01:16 | 01:13:11 +00:18 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:40 | 01:19:32 | 07:48 +00:52 | 01:20:30 -00:58 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:28:12 | 09:06 -02:22 | 01:28:18 -00:06 |
| Wall Balls | 12:57 | 01:34:56 | 09:53 +03:04 | 01:37:24 -02:28 |
| Roxzone | 10:13 | 01:57:56 | 10:39 -00:26 | 01:57:56 |
David Irving performed exceptionally well in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, securing a position within the top 63% of 4107 athletes and a commendable rank within his age group. Irving excelled in all running segments, demonstrating a clear strength in this area. His total running time was 07:24 faster than the average, indicating a dominant running profile. However, his performance in strength-related tasks and the roxzone shows room for improvement. His pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, although he started slightly slower in the initial running segment.
For better race performance, Irving should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lintzen Christoph | 2022 Essen | 01:57:56 | |
| Barraclough Peter | 2024 Birmingham | 01:57:58 | |
| Leroy Willy | 2024 Paris | 01:57:49 | |
| Todd Steve | 2023 London | 01:58:04 | |
| Cunningham Andy | 2022 Birmingham | 01:58:03 | |
| Viteri Basantes Javier Alejandro | 2024 Taipei | 01:58:25 | |
| Aviña Cristian | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:57:44 | |
| Salvagno Valerio | 2023 Milan | 01:58:00 | |
| Cussell Paul | 2023 Birmingham | 01:57:32 | |
| Lee Leonard | 2024 Singapore | 01:58:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 02:06:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
