Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hus David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hus David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hus David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hus David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:07 | 42:33 to 39:26 | 64.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:26 | 05:56 to 04:30 | 29.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:31 to 04:16 | 5.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:03 to 02:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Hus David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:53 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 03:53 | 04:21 +00:10 | 04:22 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 08:24 | 04:44 +00:24 | 08:43 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:03 | 13:32 | 02:44 -00:41 | 13:27 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 15:35 | 05:07 +00:10 | 16:11 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 20:52 | 04:34 -00:41 | 21:18 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 24:45 | 05:06 +00:23 | 25:52 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:56 | 30:14 | 04:55 +01:01 | 30:58 -00:44 |
| Running 5 | 05:44 | 36:10 | 05:15 +00:29 | 35:53 +00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 41:54 | 04:41 -00:06 | 41:08 +00:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 46:29 | 05:08 +00:28 | 45:49 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 52:05 | 02:04 -00:21 | 50:57 +01:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 53:48 | 05:07 +00:20 | 53:01 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 59:15 | 04:45 -00:29 | 58:08 +01:07 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:03:31 | 05:35 +00:28 | 01:02:53 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:09:34 | 05:58 -00:28 | 01:08:28 +01:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:42 | 01:20:37 | 06:11 -00:29 | 01:20:37 |
David Hus delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 756 out of 3118 participants, placing him in the top 24%. Within his age group (30-34), he ranked 200th, which positions him in the top 29%. His overall time was 01:20:37. Notably, his total running time was 00:42:33, which was 01:43 slower than the average, indicating that he has a stronger inclination towards strength-based activities. David's initial running segments suggest he started at a quick pace, as seen with a strong Running 1 performance. However, his pace dropped in subsequent running segments, indicating a need for improved endurance and pacing strategy. His performance in strength segments like Sled Push and Sled Pull was impressive, demonstrating his strength capabilities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Massouf Fred | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:20:34 | |
| Walker Jack | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:51 | |
| Fisher Jeff | 2023 Chicago | 01:20:10 | |
| Van Dyk Rian | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:20:31 | |
| Bell Luke | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:23 | |
| Notnagel Tom | 2023 Hamburg | 01:20:10 | |
| Alvarez Figueroa Jose Antonio | 2023 Madrid | 01:21:03 | |
| Edwards David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:35 | |
| Wilcox Andrew | 2023 London | 01:20:11 | |
| Hodgson Lee | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:20:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
