Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 226 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cutler Grace's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cutler Grace's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cutler Grace's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cutler Grace's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:47 | 01:03:06 to 57:19 | 80.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:17 | 08:52 to 07:35 | 17.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 09:15 to 09:08 | 1.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:58 to 02:56 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 03:41 to 03:40 | 0.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:49 to 06:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:58 to 05:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Cutler Grace | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:22 | 00:00 | 06:14 -01:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:27 | 04:22 | 05:36 -00:09 | 06:14 -01:52 |
| Running 2 | 07:31 | 09:49 | 06:54 +00:37 | 11:50 -02:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:41 | 17:20 | 03:38 +00:03 | 18:44 -01:24 |
| Running 3 | 07:56 | 21:01 | 07:26 +00:30 | 22:22 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 06:49 | 28:57 | 07:41 -00:52 | 29:48 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 10:13 | 35:46 | 07:29 +02:44 | 37:29 -01:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:15 | 45:59 | 09:46 -00:31 | 44:58 +01:01 |
| Running 5 | 08:47 | 55:14 | 08:07 +00:40 | 54:44 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:58 | 01:04:01 | 06:04 -00:06 | 01:02:51 +01:10 |
| Running 6 | 08:38 | 01:09:59 | 07:42 +00:56 | 01:08:55 +01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:58 | 01:18:37 | 02:50 +00:08 | 01:16:37 +02:00 |
| Running 7 | 09:18 | 01:21:35 | 07:44 +01:34 | 01:19:27 +02:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:30:53 | 07:09 -01:51 | 01:27:11 +03:42 |
| Running 8 | 06:24 | 01:36:11 | 09:03 -02:39 | 01:34:20 +01:51 |
| Wall Balls | 08:52 | 01:42:35 | 07:34 +01:18 | 01:43:23 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:29 | 02:00:49 | 09:52 -00:23 | 02:00:49 |
Your overall performance was commendable, placing in the top 32% of all athletes and the top 24% in your age group. However, there are some areas where you can greatly improve. Your total running time was 01:46 slower than the average, indicating a more strength-based profile. This is further supported by faster than average times in strength-intensive segments like the Ski Erg, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges. Your pacing in the early running segments seemed to be too fast, as seen in Running 1 where you were 01:51 faster than average, and this could have impacted your performance in later segments.
Implementing the following strategies could help enhance your race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tsiumis Dyan | 2024 New York | 02:00:49 | |
| LoftisRamirez Kimberly | 2024 Anaheim | 02:00:47 | |
| Craggs Nicola | 2024 Glasgow | 02:00:27 | |
| Vasquez Claudia | 2023 Stockholm | 02:00:38 | |
| Eijkemans Netty | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:01:15 | |
| Völkl Maria | 2019 Hamburg | 02:01:02 | |
| Carolan Carrie | 2024 Dublin | 02:00:19 | |
| Sieghart Bianca | 2024 Stockholm | 02:00:54 | |
| Opperman Susan | 2024 Brisbane | 02:01:07 | |
| Philo Ella | 2024 Melbourne | 02:00:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
