Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 305 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Collings Neil's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Collings Neil's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Collings Neil's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Collings Neil's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:48 | 12:24 to 07:36 | 49.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:38 | 11:42 to 10:04 | 16.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 09:36 to 08:15 | 13.9% |
| Run Total | 01:21 | 56:54 to 55:33 | 13.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 07:41 to 07:10 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 04:17 to 04:13 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Collings Neil | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 05:43 -01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:38 | 04:55 -00:26 | 05:43 -01:05 |
| Running 2 | 10:00 | 09:07 | 06:38 +03:22 | 10:38 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 04:17 | 19:07 | 04:02 +00:15 | 17:16 +01:51 |
| Running 3 | 06:32 | 23:24 | 07:36 -01:04 | 21:18 +02:06 |
| Sled Pull | 07:41 | 29:56 | 07:16 +00:25 | 28:54 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 06:40 | 37:37 | 07:27 -00:47 | 36:10 +01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:36 | 44:17 | 08:29 +01:07 | 43:37 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 07:33 | 53:53 | 07:52 -00:19 | 52:06 +01:47 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 01:01:26 | 05:35 -00:41 | 59:58 +01:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:22 | 01:06:20 | 07:36 -01:14 | 01:05:33 +00:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 01:12:42 | 02:54 -01:00 | 01:13:09 -00:27 |
| Running 7 | 06:31 | 01:14:36 | 07:49 -01:18 | 01:16:03 -01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 12:24 | 01:21:07 | 07:59 +04:25 | 01:23:52 -02:45 |
| Running 8 | 08:42 | 01:33:31 | 09:57 -01:15 | 01:31:51 +01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 11:42 | 01:42:13 | 10:05 +01:37 | 01:41:48 +00:25 |
| Roxzone | 09:06 | 02:02:53 | 11:00 -01:54 | 02:02:53 |
In terms of pacing, Neil appeared to have a fairly consistent speed throughout the race. His splits analysis shows that he was generally faster than average in the running segments, except for Running 2 where he was 03:32 slower than average. This suggests that Neil has a stronger running profile and should focus on maintaining and improving his running performance.
Additionally, Neil should prioritize proper form and technique throughout the race. This will help him conserve energy and improve efficiency. He should also ensure that he is properly fueling and hydrating during the race to maintain optimal performance.
In conclusion, Neil Collings had a strong performance in the 2023 Birmingham Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his performance in the identified areas, such as sandbag lunges, running 2, wall balls, burpees broad jump, and overall running, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing the suggested training strategies, exercises, and race strategies will help Neil reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Finotti Mirco | 2024 London | 02:03:01 | |
| Leary Rowan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 02:02:55 | |
| Iacono Quarantino Gabriele | 2024 Rimini | 02:02:53 | |
| C Nikesh | 2024 Melbourne | 02:03:15 | |
| Buri Suquinahua Mario Javier | 2023 Malaga | 02:03:06 | |
| Battista Martino | 2024 Milan | 02:03:23 | |
| Aldred Michael | 2023 London | 02:02:28 | |
| Mcandrew Hamish | 2024 Manchester | 02:02:50 | |
| Sinforoso Erick John | 2023 Dubai | 02:03:08 | |
| Oakley Kristan | 2024 Manchester | 02:03:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
