Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Begley Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Begley Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Begley Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Begley Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:39 | 04:37 to 02:58 | 27.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:06 | 06:10 to 05:04 | 18.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:58 | 07:40 to 06:42 | 16.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 03:04 to 02:13 | 14.1% |
| Rowing | 00:49 | 05:41 to 04:52 | 13.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:36 | 05:06 to 04:30 | 10.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 05:19 to 05:17 | 0.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:11 to 40:11 | 0.0% |
| Begley Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:58 | 00:00 | 04:48 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 04:58 | 04:32 +00:34 | 04:48 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 10:04 | 05:13 -00:36 | 09:20 +00:44 |
| Sled Push | 04:37 | 14:41 | 03:06 +01:31 | 14:33 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 19:18 | 05:42 -00:41 | 17:39 +01:39 |
| Sled Pull | 06:10 | 24:19 | 05:17 +00:53 | 23:21 +00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 30:29 | 05:40 -00:39 | 28:38 +01:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 35:30 | 05:53 -00:35 | 34:18 +01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 40:48 | 05:52 -00:43 | 40:11 +00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 45:57 | 04:56 +00:45 | 46:03 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:52 | 51:38 | 05:42 -00:50 | 50:59 +00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:04 | 56:30 | 02:19 +00:45 | 56:41 -00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 59:34 | 05:41 -00:35 | 59:00 +00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 01:04:40 | 05:32 -00:13 | 01:04:41 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:30 | 01:09:59 | 06:25 -00:55 | 01:10:13 -00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 07:40 | 01:15:29 | 07:07 +00:33 | 01:16:38 -01:09 |
| Roxzone | 08:19 | 01:31:20 | 07:35 +00:44 | 01:31:20 |
Martin Begley has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, securing an overall rank in the top 43%, which is quite an achievement considering the number of athletes competing. His strength lies prominently in his running skills where he has clocked in a remarkable total running time that is 05:09 faster than average. This indicates that Martin falls into the runner profile which means he can further boost his performance by focusing more on strength training. He has also displayed consistent pacing, with all his running segment times being faster than average. It is noteworthy that Martin started slower in 'Running 1' which could be an indication of a cautious start, but he quickly gained pace in the subsequent segments.
Improving the following strategies can lead to better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Warrilow Michael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:09 | |
| Schenk Till | 2024 Stockholm | 01:30:59 | |
| Reichmann Alexander | 2019 Essen | 01:31:27 | |
| Stelter Julian | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:51 | |
| Eichhorn Henning | 2022 Essen | 01:31:19 | |
| Santorelli Christian | 2024 Anaheim | 01:31:36 | |
| Guerrero Domínguez Antonio | 2022 Valencia | 01:30:55 | |
| Chang Daniel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:48 | |
| Petereit Lukas | 2023 Hannover | 01:31:20 | |
| Ball Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:31:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
