Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 626 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ahmad Azeem's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ahmad Azeem's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ahmad Azeem's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ahmad Azeem's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:39 | 09:37 to 06:58 | 73.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 03:29 to 02:51 | 17.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 05:04 to 04:52 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:30 to 05:22 | 3.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:32 to 07:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:56 to 08:56 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:43 to 51:43 | 0.0% |
| Ahmad Azeem | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:33 | 00:00 | 05:33 +01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 06:33 | 04:49 +00:15 | 05:33 +01:00 |
| Running 2 | 06:00 | 11:37 | 06:05 -00:05 | 10:22 +01:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 17:37 | 03:45 -00:40 | 16:27 +01:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:13 | 20:42 | 06:48 -00:35 | 20:12 +00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:50 | 26:55 | 06:34 -00:44 | 27:00 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:20 | 32:45 | 06:46 -00:26 | 33:34 -00:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:32 | 39:05 | 07:40 -00:08 | 40:20 -01:15 |
| Running 5 | 06:36 | 46:37 | 07:09 -00:33 | 48:00 -01:23 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 53:13 | 05:23 +00:07 | 55:09 -01:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 58:43 | 06:50 -00:25 | 01:00:32 -01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:29 | 01:05:08 | 02:44 +00:45 | 01:07:22 -02:14 |
| Running 7 | 06:32 | 01:08:37 | 06:53 -00:21 | 01:10:06 -01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:37 | 01:15:09 | 07:08 +02:29 | 01:16:59 -01:50 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:24:46 | 08:38 -01:30 | 01:24:07 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 08:56 | 01:31:54 | 09:17 -00:21 | 01:32:45 -00:51 |
| Roxzone | 11:30 | 01:52:13 | 10:11 +01:19 | 01:52:13 |
Azeem Ahmad had a commendable performance in the 2024 Poznan race, finishing in the top 92% of all athletes. His total running time was especially impressive, finishing 03:21 faster than average. This indicates Azeem has a strong runner profile, demonstrating excellent endurance and speed in his running segments. He started off slower than the average in his first running segment, however, he quickly made up for this by consistently outperforming the average time in subsequent running segments. His strength performance was varied, with some segments being significantly faster than average, while others were slower. This suggests a balanced training approach, focusing both on his running and strength, would be optimal.
To optimize his performance in future races, Azeem should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Leong Jeffrey | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:52:20 | |
| Zeng Michael | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:51:46 | |
| Khairudin Khid | 2023 Singapore | 01:52:40 | |
| Rice Ciaran | 2023 Dallas | 01:52:34 | |
| Resta Edoardo | 2023 Rimini | 01:51:53 | |
| Bautista Tyler | 2024 Dallas | 01:52:35 | |
| Matt Stefan | 2021 Hamburg | 01:52:21 | |
| Ramos Christian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:52:22 | |
| Todd Iain | 2023 Glasgow | 01:51:58 | |
| Van Duijn Erik | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:52:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 02:13:56 | |
| 2024 Dublin | 01:50:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
