Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 648 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Wulfken Philip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Wulfken Philip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Wulfken Philip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Wulfken Philip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:09 | 57:40 to 52:31 | 67.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:27 | 10:01 to 07:34 | 32.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:24 to 06:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:07 to 09:07 | 0.0% |
| Wulfken Philip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:45 | 00:00 | 05:30 -01:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 03:45 | 04:49 -00:39 | 05:30 -01:45 |
| Running 2 | 06:22 | 07:55 | 06:05 +00:17 | 10:19 -02:24 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 14:17 | 03:48 -00:13 | 16:24 -02:07 |
| Running 3 | 08:14 | 17:52 | 06:52 +01:22 | 20:12 -02:20 |
| Sled Pull | 06:24 | 26:06 | 06:36 -00:12 | 27:04 -00:58 |
| Running 4 | 07:51 | 32:30 | 06:48 +01:03 | 33:40 -01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:01 | 40:21 | 07:44 +02:17 | 40:28 -00:07 |
| Running 5 | 08:50 | 50:22 | 07:11 +01:39 | 48:12 +02:10 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 59:12 | 05:23 -00:17 | 55:23 +03:49 |
| Running 6 | 07:15 | 01:04:18 | 06:53 +00:22 | 01:00:46 +03:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 01:11:33 | 02:46 -00:40 | 01:07:39 +03:54 |
| Running 7 | 07:09 | 01:13:39 | 06:56 +00:13 | 01:10:25 +03:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:54 | 01:20:48 | 07:16 -01:22 | 01:17:21 +03:27 |
| Running 8 | 08:17 | 01:26:42 | 08:33 -00:16 | 01:24:37 +02:05 |
| Wall Balls | 09:07 | 01:34:59 | 09:20 -00:13 | 01:33:10 +01:49 |
| Roxzone | 08:49 | 01:52:48 | 10:18 -01:29 | 01:52:48 |
Based on the splits analysis, Philip performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, finishing 01:31 and 00:37 faster than the average, respectively. He also performed above average in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, finishing 00:39 and 00:42 faster than the average, respectively. However, he struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
In conclusion, Philip Wulfken performed well in the Hyrox race, with strong performances in certain segments. However, there are areas that require improvement, particularly in the running segments and the Burpees Broad Jump. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and mental preparation, Philip can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bloch Erik | 2018 Hamburg | 01:53:08 | |
| Nitu Claudiu | 2024 Berlin | 01:52:50 | |
| Hodgson Jonathan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:52:21 | |
| Sydney Sandy | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:53:11 | |
| Lynch Tim | 2021 Birmingham | 01:52:49 | |
| Jess Robert | 2024 Madrid | 01:52:30 | |
| Kist Michael | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:52:24 | |
| Golomako Semen | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:53:16 | |
| Warkow Tyson | 2022 München | 01:52:37 | |
| White Jamie | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:52:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
