Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Teo Keefe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Teo Keefe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Teo Keefe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Teo Keefe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:15 | 06:39 to 05:24 | 51.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 06:04 to 04:57 | 46.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 06:33 to 06:30 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:28 to 42:28 | 0.0% |
| Teo Keefe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:31 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 05:31 | 04:30 -00:08 | 04:47 +00:44 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 09:53 | 05:07 -00:30 | 09:17 +00:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 14:30 | 03:03 -00:13 | 14:24 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 17:20 | 05:35 +00:11 | 17:27 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 06:04 | 23:06 | 05:12 +00:52 | 23:02 +00:04 |
| Running 4 | 05:36 | 29:10 | 05:35 +00:01 | 28:14 +00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:39 | 34:46 | 05:41 +00:58 | 33:49 +00:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 41:25 | 05:46 +00:02 | 39:30 +01:55 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 47:13 | 04:54 -00:08 | 45:16 +01:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:33 | 51:59 | 05:36 -00:03 | 50:10 +01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 57:32 | 02:17 -00:12 | 55:46 +01:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 59:37 | 05:35 -00:20 | 58:03 +01:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 01:04:52 | 05:25 -00:23 | 01:03:38 +01:14 |
| Running 8 | 04:24 | 01:09:54 | 06:17 -01:53 | 01:09:03 +00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 06:33 | 01:14:18 | 06:55 -00:22 | 01:15:20 -01:02 |
| Roxzone | 08:48 | 01:29:33 | 07:18 +01:30 | 01:29:33 |
Keefe Teo's performance at the 2024 Milan Hyrox race shows a balanced profile with a slight emphasis on running, as indicated by his total running time being 02:17 faster than the average. This suggests that his running capability is a strength. His best running lap time of 00:04:24 further supports this, marking him as having strong potential in running segments. However, his performance in strength-related exercises and transitions, particularly the Roxzone, indicates room for improvement. The initial running segments suggest a conservative start, with Running 1 being 00:48 slower than average, which might have been a strategy to conserve energy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dunn Paul | 2023 London | 01:29:12 | |
| Troindl Michael | 2019 Wien | 01:29:58 | |
| Kelshaw Robbie | 2023 Manchester | 01:29:13 | |
| Trenschel Marius | 2023 Hannover | 01:29:52 | |
| Gonzalez José | 2023 Paris | 01:29:42 | |
| Ford Joseph | 2023 Malaga | 01:29:27 | |
| Mallin Kieran | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:48 | |
| Bormann Philipp | 2019 Leipzig | 01:29:39 | |
| Ginever Paul | 2021 Birmingham | 01:29:55 | |
| Eßeling Genannt Knüsting Philipp | 2023 Köln | 01:29:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:17:09 | |
| 2024 Singapore | 01:43:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
