Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Taggart Cal's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Taggart Cal's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Taggart Cal's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Taggart Cal's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:34 | 10:44 to 08:10 | 47.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 07:53 to 06:47 | 20.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:58 | 06:58 to 06:00 | 17.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 06:38 to 06:16 | 6.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:56 to 02:36 | 6.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 03:34 to 03:31 | 0.9% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:11 to 05:10 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:23 to 47:23 | 0.0% |
| Taggart Cal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:07 | 00:00 | 05:12 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:07 | 04:42 -00:21 | 05:12 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 09:28 | 05:44 -00:23 | 09:54 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 14:49 | 03:30 +00:04 | 15:38 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 06:19 | 18:23 | 06:19 +00:00 | 19:08 -00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 06:58 | 24:42 | 06:05 +00:53 | 25:27 -00:45 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 31:40 | 06:18 -00:08 | 31:32 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:53 | 37:50 | 06:54 +00:59 | 37:50 +00:00 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 45:43 | 06:34 -00:05 | 44:44 +00:59 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 52:12 | 05:12 -00:01 | 51:18 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 57:23 | 06:22 -00:23 | 56:30 +00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:56 | 01:03:22 | 02:35 +00:21 | 01:02:52 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:06:18 | 06:20 -00:28 | 01:05:27 +00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:38 | 01:12:10 | 06:29 +00:09 | 01:11:47 +00:23 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:18:48 | 07:33 -01:24 | 01:18:16 +00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 10:44 | 01:24:57 | 08:28 +02:16 | 01:25:49 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 07:50 | 01:43:25 | 09:08 -01:18 | 01:43:25 |
Cal Taggart's performance in the 2024 Glasgow HYROX race positions him in the top 57% overall and top 49% within his age group, marking a commendable achievement. His total running time was 03:18 faster than the average, indicating a significant strength in running, suggesting a more runner-oriented profile. The analysis shows he started the race well, maintaining a good pace throughout the initial running segments. However, certain strength-focused challenges, notably the Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sled Pull, significantly impacted his overall time. His faster-than-average Roxzone time also suggests efficient transitions between exercises, but there is room for improvement in overall fitness to boost these segments further.
Implementing these tailored training strategies and focusing on race-specific conditioning will significantly enhance Cal Taggart's future HYROX performances. A balanced focus on maintaining his running prowess while substantially improving strength and technique in targeted areas will make him a more formidable competitor.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Anand Anubhav | 2024 Dubai | 01:42:58 | |
| Yarger Daryll | 2022 Dallas | 01:43:41 | |
| Bendt Jezriël | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:43:15 | |
| Poloczek Simon | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:43:16 | |
| Kottmel Gerald | 2022 Berlin | 01:43:35 | |
| Rodriguez Connor | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:43:38 | |
| Akinyemi Ola | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:43:32 | |
| Watson Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:33 | |
| Brown Mike | 2023 London | 01:43:31 | |
| Wahl Niklas | 2024 Hamburg | 01:43:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
