Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 121 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 (From 12:51 to 08:11) | 38.2% |
| Sled Pull | 03:09 (From 10:49 to 07:40) | 25.8% |
| Wall Balls | 02:27 (From 13:21 to 10:54) | 20.1% |
| Run Total | 01:52 (From 01:00:17 to 58:25) | 15.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 (From 05:09 to 05:05) | 0.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 (From 03:16 to 03:15) | 0.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 04:04 to 04:04) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 07:49 to 07:49) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:35 to 05:35) | 0.0% |
| Giacomelli Luca | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:29 | 00:00 | 06:02 +01:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:09 | 07:29 | 05:07 +00:02 | 06:02 +01:27 |
| Running 2 | 06:29 | 12:38 | 06:56 -00:27 | 11:09 +01:29 |
| Sled Push | 04:04 | 19:07 | 04:36 -00:32 | 18:05 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 07:43 | 23:11 | 08:08 -00:25 | 22:41 +00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 10:49 | 30:54 | 08:15 +02:34 | 30:49 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 07:21 | 41:43 | 08:02 -00:41 | 39:04 +02:39 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:49 | 49:04 | 09:32 -01:43 | 47:06 +01:58 |
| Running 5 | 07:54 | 56:53 | 08:40 -00:46 | 56:38 +00:15 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 01:04:47 | 05:50 -00:15 | 01:05:18 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 07:28 | 01:10:22 | 08:15 -00:47 | 01:11:08 -00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:16 | 01:17:50 | 03:15 +00:01 | 01:19:23 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 07:50 | 01:21:06 | 08:30 -00:40 | 01:22:38 -01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 12:51 | 01:28:56 | 09:32 +03:19 | 01:31:08 -02:12 |
| Running 8 | 08:08 | 01:41:47 | 11:32 -03:24 | 01:40:40 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 13:21 | 01:49:55 | 12:14 +01:07 | 01:52:12 -02:17 |
| Roxzone | 13:35 | 02:16:42 | 12:16 +01:19 | 02:16:42 |
Luca Giacomelli demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox event, finishing with an overall time of 02:16:42. Despite being in the upper age bracket (45-49), he impressively exceeded the average running performance with a Total Running Time of 01:00:17, which is 06:30 faster than average, highlighting his strong runner profile. However, he ranked in the lower percentiles overall, indicating room for improvement in strength-oriented segments. His pacing strategy was somewhat inconsistent, starting slower than average in the initial run but gaining speed in subsequent segments before slowing again towards the end, suggesting a need for better energy distribution throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ong Gallan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:16:36 | |
| Patt Dylan | 2023 Singapore | 02:16:38 | |
| Rew Nick | 2023 Birmingham | 02:16:40 | |
| Manzo Alessandro | 2023 Milan | 02:16:39 | |
| Sehnert Jürgen | 2019 Frankfurt | 02:16:23 | |
| Ataman Michael | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:17:11 | |
| Busby Paul | 2022 London | 02:16:35 | |
| Hurtado Diego | 2022 Dallas | 02:16:24 | |
| Zepeda Pozos Iva | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 02:16:49 | |
| Hameed Adam | 2022 Manchester | 02:17:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Turin Giacomelli Luca | 01:47:54 | |
| 2024 Milan Martignetti Eva, Giacomelli Luca | 01:36:15 | |
| 2024 Rimini Martignetti Eva, Giacomelli Luca | 01:32:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Giacomelli Luca
