Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Ciudad de Mexico using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 811 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De La Rosa Salazar Aimee's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De La Rosa Salazar Aimee's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De La Rosa Salazar Aimee's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De La Rosa Salazar Aimee's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:45 | 05:01 to 03:16 | 27.5% |
| Run Total | 01:26 | 40:00 to 38:34 | 22.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 | 05:09 to 04:12 | 14.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 04:57 to 04:14 | 11.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:29 | 02:15 to 01:46 | 7.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:21 | 02:20 to 01:59 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:57 to 04:39 | 4.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 03:49 to 03:35 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:02 to 04:53 | 2.4% |
| De La Rosa Salazar Aimee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:17 | 00:00 | 04:35 +01:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 06:17 | 04:51 +00:06 | 04:35 +01:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:34 | 11:14 | 04:49 -00:15 | 09:26 +01:48 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 15:48 | 02:23 -00:03 | 14:15 +01:33 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 18:08 | 05:03 -00:19 | 16:38 +01:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 22:52 | 04:47 +00:22 | 21:41 +01:11 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 28:01 | 05:04 -00:18 | 26:28 +01:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:57 | 32:47 | 04:49 +00:08 | 31:32 +01:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 37:44 | 05:10 -00:10 | 36:21 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 42:44 | 05:04 -00:02 | 41:31 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 04:53 | 47:46 | 05:06 -00:13 | 46:35 +01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 52:39 | 01:59 +00:16 | 51:41 +00:58 |
| Running 7 | 04:45 | 54:54 | 05:04 -00:19 | 53:40 +01:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:49 | 59:39 | 03:58 -00:09 | 58:44 +00:55 |
| Running 8 | 05:05 | 01:03:28 | 05:22 -00:17 | 01:02:42 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:01 | 01:08:33 | 03:56 +01:05 | 01:08:04 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 04:05 | 01:17:31 | 05:31 -01:26 | 01:17:31 |
Aimee De La Rosa Salazar has shown exceptional performance in the 2024 Ciudad de Mexico HYROX event, securing an overall rank of 3 among 1320 athletes and emerging as the top athlete in her age group. Her total running time was 24 seconds faster than the average, showcasing her strength in running. Despite a slower start in the first running segment, she maintained an above-average pace in subsequent segments. This indicates a need for better initial pacing without compromising her overall running prowess. Her performance in the roxzone was also impressive, being faster than average by a significant 1 minute and 18 seconds. This suggests excellent overall fitness levels and efficient transition times.
Despite the strong overall performance, there are a few segments where Aimee could improve. The most significant setbacks were in the Wall Balls and Sled Pull segments.
Aimee could implement a few strategies to enhance her overall race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martín Foces Virginia | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:39 | |
| Wolfkeil Heike | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:17:41 | |
| Cohen Farah | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:01 | |
| Gąsior Natalia | 2024 Poznan | 01:17:37 | |
| Schmidt Tatjana | 2022 Bremen | 01:18:01 | |
| Palframan Natalie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:46 | |
| Kilkenny Chloe | 2023 Melbourne | 01:17:58 | |
| Manon Fournel | 2023 Barcelona | 01:17:14 | |
| Lambrechts Freya | 2024 Maastricht | 01:17:08 | |
| De Vos Priscilla | 2024 Hamburg | 01:17:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Mexico City | 01:22:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
