Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 95 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Constant Love's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Constant Love's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Constant Love's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Constant Love's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 29:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 25:55 | 01:24:21 to 58:26 | 89.2% |
| Sled Pull | 02:03 | 09:43 to 07:40 | 7.1% |
| Rowing | 00:57 | 06:37 to 05:40 | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 03:23 to 03:15 | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:47 to 07:47 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 08:03 to 08:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Constant Love | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:34 | 00:00 | 06:23 +01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 07:34 | 05:08 -00:15 | 06:23 +01:11 |
| Running 2 | 07:53 | 12:27 | 07:29 +00:24 | 11:31 +00:56 |
| Sled Push | 04:02 | 20:20 | 04:29 -00:27 | 19:00 +01:20 |
| Running 3 | 10:13 | 24:22 | 08:37 +01:36 | 23:29 +00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 09:43 | 34:35 | 08:23 +01:20 | 32:06 +02:29 |
| Running 4 | 10:29 | 44:18 | 08:29 +02:00 | 40:29 +03:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:47 | 54:47 | 09:47 -02:00 | 48:58 +05:49 |
| Running 5 | 10:52 | 01:02:34 | 09:37 +01:15 | 58:45 +03:49 |
| Rowing | 06:37 | 01:13:26 | 05:45 +00:52 | 01:08:22 +05:04 |
| Running 6 | 10:11 | 01:20:03 | 08:48 +01:23 | 01:14:07 +05:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:23 | 01:30:14 | 03:16 +00:07 | 01:22:55 +07:19 |
| Running 7 | 10:38 | 01:33:37 | 08:46 +01:52 | 01:26:11 +07:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:03 | 01:44:15 | 08:49 -00:46 | 01:34:57 +09:18 |
| Running 8 | 13:35 | 01:52:18 | 12:07 +01:28 | 01:43:46 +08:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 02:05:53 | 12:39 -05:41 | 01:55:53 +10:00 |
| Roxzone | 08:11 | 02:20:54 | 12:22 -04:11 | 02:20:54 |
Love Constant's total running time was 01:24:21, which was 22:26 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:07:34, which was 01:32 slower than the average.
To improve the overall running performance, Love Constant should prioritize training for running. This can be achieved by incorporating specific running drills and exercises into his training routine. Some suggestions include interval training, hill sprints, tempo runs, and long-distance runs. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, Love Constant will be able to make up for the time lost in these segments.
For the segments where Love Constant performed below average, such as Running 7, Running 4, Running 8, and Running 3, he should work on improving his running technique and efficiency. This can be achieved through exercises that focus on running form, such as high knees, butt kicks, and strides. Additionally, incorporating strength training exercises that target the muscles used in running, such as lunges, squats, and calf raises, can help improve his running performance.
In the segments where Love Constant performed better than average, such as Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump, he should continue to focus on maintaining and improving his strength and power. This can be achieved through exercises such as sled pushes and pulls, burpees, and broad jumps. By continuing to build strength and power, Love Constant will be able to perform well in these segments and potentially gain an advantage over his competitors.
Overall, Love Constant has shown potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance and implementing strategic race strategies, he can continue to improve his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martino Jd | 2023 New York | 02:21:08 | |
| Kingsford Paul | 2023 London | 02:20:35 | |
| ABRAMOVICH WARREN | 2023 Dallas | 02:20:48 | |
| Leszinski César | 2024 Karlsruhe | 02:21:16 | |
| Chan Shayne | 2023 Singapore | 02:20:45 | |
| Van Wyk Scott | 2023 Miami | 02:21:06 | |
| Sanford John | 2022 Dallas | 02:20:56 | |
| Soh Mitchell | 2023 Singapore | 02:20:59 | |
| Burke Scott | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:21:06 | |
| Felicetti Matteo | 2024 Turin | 02:21:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Miami | 02:28:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
