Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:34 (From 52:28 to 46:54) | 85.2% |
| BBJ | 00:58 (From 07:13 to 06:15) | 14.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 05:03 to 05:03) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:24 to 02:24) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:39 to 05:39) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:20 to 05:20) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:11 to 02:11) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:39 to 04:39) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 02:48 to 02:48) | 0.0% |
| Pam Janet | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 05:17 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 05:35 | 05:11 -00:08 | 05:17 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 10:38 | 05:39 +00:05 | 10:28 +00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 16:22 | 02:53 -00:29 | 16:07 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 06:50 | 18:46 | 05:59 +00:51 | 19:00 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 25:36 | 06:04 -00:25 | 24:59 +00:37 |
| Running 4 | 06:38 | 31:15 | 06:00 +00:38 | 31:03 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:13 | 37:53 | 06:37 +00:36 | 37:03 +00:50 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 45:06 | 06:11 +00:20 | 43:40 +01:26 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 51:37 | 05:28 -00:08 | 49:51 +01:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:17 | 56:57 | 06:03 +00:14 | 55:19 +01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 01:03:14 | 02:22 -00:11 | 01:01:22 +01:52 |
| Running 7 | 06:30 | 01:05:25 | 06:03 +00:27 | 01:03:44 +01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 01:11:55 | 05:04 -00:25 | 01:09:47 +02:08 |
| Running 8 | 08:27 | 01:16:34 | 06:33 +01:54 | 01:14:51 +01:43 |
| Wall Balls | 02:48 | 01:25:01 | 05:21 -02:33 | 01:21:24 +03:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:27 | 01:34:07 | 07:22 -00:55 | 01:34:07 |
In terms of pacing, Janet's splits indicate that she had a consistent performance throughout the race. However, it is worth noting that her total running time was 06:06 slower than the average. This suggests that she may benefit from improving her running speed and endurance.
Overall, Janet Pam had a strong performance in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her running speed and endurance, as well as addressing the specific segments where she lost the most time, she can further enhance her performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies and techniques, along with implementing effective race strategies, will help her achieve her goals and continue to excel in her age group category.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tham Deborah | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:07 | |
| Melody Shannon | 2024 Perth | 01:33:47 | |
| Shooshtarian Ghazal | 2023 New York | 01:34:26 | |
| Mozas Margot | 2024 Marseille | 01:34:28 | |
| Casey Kathryn | 2023 Dublin | 01:34:01 | |
| Tan Gillian | 2024 Singapore | 01:33:45 | |
| Saleh Kookie | 2024 Milan | 01:34:16 | |
| Schui Susanne | 2019 Leipzig | 01:34:15 | |
| Pragnell Casey | 2024 London | 01:34:17 | |
| Delia Sophie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:33:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham Pam Janet | 01:38:26 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London Pam Janet | 01:36:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Pam Janet
