Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 18 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Nasser Dana's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Nasser Dana hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Nasser Dana’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nasser Dana's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 32:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 20:14 | 01:24:18 to 01:04:04 | 62.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:40 | 19:40 to 11:00 | 26.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:40 | 10:51 to 09:11 | 5.1% |
| Rowing | 00:51 | 07:15 to 06:24 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 04:56 to 04:16 | 2.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 03:39 to 03:22 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 06:02 to 05:57 | 0.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:58 to 06:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 09:13 to 09:13 | 0.0% |
| Nasser Dana | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:09 | 00:00 | 07:52 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:02 | 07:09 | 06:25 -00:23 | 07:52 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 09:32 | 13:11 | 08:49 +00:43 | 14:17 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 04:56 | 22:43 | 04:07 +00:49 | 23:06 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 10:12 | 27:39 | 09:46 +00:26 | 27:13 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 10:51 | 37:51 | 09:29 +01:22 | 36:59 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 10:46 | 48:42 | 09:56 +00:50 | 46:28 +02:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 19:40 | 59:28 | 16:31 +03:09 | 56:24 +03:04 |
| Running 5 | 10:51 | 01:19:08 | 10:32 +00:19 | 01:12:55 +06:13 |
| Rowing | 07:15 | 01:29:59 | 06:44 +00:31 | 01:23:27 +06:32 |
| Running 6 | 11:12 | 01:37:14 | 10:18 +00:54 | 01:30:11 +07:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:39 | 01:48:26 | 03:32 +00:07 | 01:40:29 +07:57 |
| Running 7 | 12:17 | 01:52:05 | 10:51 +01:26 | 01:44:01 +08:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:58 | 02:04:22 | 13:18 -06:20 | 01:54:52 +09:30 |
| Running 8 | 12:22 | 02:11:20 | 13:01 -00:39 | 02:08:10 +03:10 |
| Wall Balls | 09:13 | 02:23:42 | 12:02 -02:49 | 02:21:11 +02:31 |
| Roxzone | 13:02 | 02:45:50 | 12:37 +00:25 | 02:45:50 |
Dana Nasser, competing in the 40-44 age group, displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier race, ranking in the top 42% of all athletes and top 37% in her age group. Her overall time was 02:45:50, demonstrating notable endurance and strength.
The total running time of 01:24:18 was slower than the average, indicating that Dana has a strength-oriented profile. Dana began the race at an impressive pace, performing faster than average in the first running segment. However, her pace decreased in the subsequent running segments, suggesting that she may have started the race too fast.
Based on Dana's performance, the following strategies could be implemented for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wroblewski Jennifer | 2024 Hamburg | 02:45:29 | |
| Hawthorn Sydney | 2024 Birmingham | 02:45:30 | |
| Auvray Muriel | 2024 Paris | 02:45:33 | |
| Mitchell Imani | 2021 Chicago | 02:46:20 | |
| Coggins April | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 02:46:07 | |
| Mcnaughton Lorna | 2023 Glasgow | 02:45:59 | |
| Hill Anita | 2022 Birmingham | 02:45:38 | |
| Walesa Natalie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 02:45:57 | |
| Billows Lindsey | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 02:46:11 | |
| Krug Bonnie | 2019 Karlsruhe | 02:46:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
